Abstract
Most recent models of the partitioning of reproduction attempt to explain patterns of skew on the assumption that dominant individuals have complete control over breeding opportunities within the group, but may nevertheless concede a share of direct reproduction to subordinates as an incentive to remain peacefully in the association. Although these models may be applicable to some animal societies, we argue that they fail to provide a comprehensive theory of skew. Instead, we suggest that subordinates may often be able to claim unsanctioned reproduction for themselves, but will be forced to exercise a degree of reproductive restraint lest they incite ejection by the dominant. Reproductive skew, in other words, may reflect the threat of ejection (inducing subordinate restraint) rather than the threat of subordinate departure (inducing reproductive concessions by dominants). We present a simple ESS model of reproductive skew under these circumstances, which demonstrates that a shift in emphasis from reproductive concessions by dominants to reproductive restraint on the part of subordinates, radically alters the predictions of skew models. High group productivity, high relatedness and (when group members are related) strong ecological constraints are all expected to lead to reduced skew (the opposite conclusions to those of previous, concession-based analyses). The reason is that these factors reduce the benefits (or increase the costs) of ejection to the dominant, who therefore does best to tolerate more subordinate reproduction.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (118.6 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cant MA. A model for the evolution of reproductive skew without reproductive suppression. Anim Behav. 1998 Jan;55(1):163–169. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Clutton-Brock T. H., Brotherton P. N., Smith R., McIlrath G. M., Kansky R., Gaynor D., O'Riain M. J., Skinner J. D. Infanticide and expulsion of females in a cooperative mammal. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Dec 7;265(1412):2291–2295. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Henzi S. P., Lucas J. W. Observations on the Inter-troop movement of adult vervet monkeys (Cercopithecus aethiops). Folia Primatol (Basel) 1980;33(3):220–235. doi: 10.1159/000155936. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Schaffner CM, French JA. Group size and aggression: 'recruitment incentives' in a cooperatively breeding primate. Anim Behav. 1997 Jul;54(1):171–180. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0413. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]