Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Feb 22;266(1417):347–354. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0644

Sex-biased dispersal in sperm whales: contrasting mitochondrial and nuclear genetic structure of global populations.

T Lyrholm 1, O Leimar 1, B Johanneson 1, U Gyllensten 1
PMCID: PMC1689695  PMID: 10097396

Abstract

The social organization of most mammals is characterized by female philopatry and male dispersal. Such sex-biased dispersal can cause the genetic structure of populations to differ between the maternally inherited mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) and the bi-parental nuclear genome. Here we report on the global genetic structure of oceanic populations of the sperm whale, one of the most widely distributed mammalian species. Groups of females and juveniles are mainly found at low latitudes, while males reach polar waters, returning to tropical and subtropical waters to breed. In comparisons between oceans, we did not find significant heterogeneity in allele frequencies of microsatellite loci (exact test; p = 0.23). Estimates of GST = 0.001 and RST = 0.005 also indicated negligible if any nuclear DNA differentiation. We have previously reported significant differentiation between oceans in mtDNA sequences. These contrasting patterns suggest that interoceanic movements have been more prevalent among males than among females, consistent with observations of females being the philopatric sex and having a more limited latitudinal distribution than males. Consequently, the typical mammalian dispersal pattern may have operated on a global scale in sperm whales.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (153.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Amos W., Sawcer S. J., Feakes R. W., Rubinsztein D. C. Microsatellites show mutational bias and heterozygote instability. Nat Genet. 1996 Aug;13(4):390–391. doi: 10.1038/ng0896-390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker C. S., Palumbi S. R., Lambertsen R. H., Weinrich M. T., Calambokidis J., O'Brien S. J. Influence of seasonal migration on geographic distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in humpback whales. Nature. 1990 Mar 15;344(6263):238–240. doi: 10.1038/344238a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Baker C. S., Perry A., Bannister J. L., Weinrich M. T., Abernethy R. B., Calambokidis J., Lien J., Lambertsen R. H., Ramírez J. U., Vasquez O. Abundant mitochondrial DNA variation and world-wide population structure in humpback whales. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Sep 1;90(17):8239–8243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.17.8239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bérubé M., Palsbøll P. Identification of sex in cetaceans by multiplexing with three ZFX and ZFY specific primers. Mol Ecol. 1996 Apr;5(2):283–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00315.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Garza J. C., Freimer N. B. Homoplasy for size at microsatellite loci in humans and chimpanzees. Genome Res. 1996 Mar;6(3):211–217. doi: 10.1101/gr.6.3.211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Grimaldi M. C., Crouau-Roy B. Microsatellite allelic homoplasy due to variable flanking sequences. J Mol Evol. 1997 Mar;44(3):336–340. doi: 10.1007/pl00006151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hamilton W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hoelzel A. R., Dahlheim M., Stern S. J. Low genetic variation among killer whales (Orcinus orca) in the eastern north Pacific and genetic differentiation between foraging specialists. J Hered. 1998 Mar-Apr;89(2):121–128. doi: 10.1093/jhered/89.2.121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hoelzel A. R., Potter C. W., Best P. B. Genetic differentiation between parapatric 'nearshore' and 'offshore' populations of the bottlenose dolphin. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Jul 7;265(1402):1177–1183. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0416. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lyrholm T., Gyllensten U. Global matrilineal population structure in sperm whales as indicated by mitochondrial DNA sequences. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Sep 7;265(1406):1679–1684. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Lyrholm T., Leimar O., Gyllensten U. Low diversity and biased substitution patterns in the mitochondrial DNA control region of sperm whales: implications for estimates of time since common ancestry. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Dec;13(10):1318–1326. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Nei M., Chesser R. K. Estimation of fixation indices and gene diversities. Ann Hum Genet. 1983 Jul;47(Pt 3):253–259. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1983.tb00993.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Palsbøll P. J., Allen J., Bérubé M., Clapham P. J., Feddersen T. P., Hammond P. S., Hudson R. R., Jørgensen H., Katona S., Larsen A. H. Genetic tagging of humpback whales. Nature. 1997 Aug 21;388(6644):767–769. doi: 10.1038/42005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Palsbøll P. J., Bérubé M., Larsen A. H., Jørgensen H. Primers for the amplification of tri- and tetramer microsatellite loci in baleen whales. Mol Ecol. 1997 Sep;6(9):893–895. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1997.tb00146.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Palumbi S. R., Baker C. S. Contrasting population structure from nuclear intron sequences and mtDNA of humpback whales. Mol Biol Evol. 1994 May;11(3):426–435. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Primmer C. R., Saino N., Møller A. P., Ellegren H. Directional evolution in germline microsatellite mutations. Nat Genet. 1996 Aug;13(4):391–393. doi: 10.1038/ng0896-391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Richard K. R., Dillon M. C., Whitehead H., Wright J. M. Patterns of kinship in groups of free-living sperm whales (Physeter macrocephalus) revealed by multiple molecular genetic analyses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Aug 6;93(16):8792–8795. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.16.8792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Richard K. R., Whitehead H., Wright J. M. Polymorphic microsatellites from sperm whales and their use in the genetic identification of individuals from naturally sloughed pieces of skin. Mol Ecol. 1996 Apr;5(2):313–315. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00321.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Slatkin M. A measure of population subdivision based on microsatellite allele frequencies. Genetics. 1995 Jan;139(1):457–462. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.1.457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Valsecchi E., Amos W. Microsatellite markers for the study of cetacean populations. Mol Ecol. 1996 Feb;5(1):151–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00301.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Valsecchi E., Palsbøll P., Hale P., Glockner-Ferrari D., Ferrari M., Clapham P., Larsen F., Mattila D., Sears R., Sigurjonsson J. Microsatellite genetic distances between oceanic populations of the humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae). Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Apr;14(4):355–362. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. van Pijlen I. A., Amos B., Burke T. Patterns of genetic variability at individual minisatellite loci in minke whale Balaenoptera acutorostrata populations from three different oceans. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 May;12(3):459–472. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES