Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Mar 22;266(1419):537. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0669

Nightingales respond more strongly to vocal leaders of simulated dyadic interactions

M Naguib, C Fichtel, D Todt
PMCID: PMC1689802

Abstract

Although vocal interactions in songbirds have been well studied, little is known about the extent to which birds attend to their conspecifics' interactions. Attending to others' interactions can provide valuable information since vocal interactions are often asymmetrical and can reflect differences in the state or quality of the signallers. Playback experiments with simulated dyadic interactions showed that male territorial nightingales (Luscinia megarhynchos) attend to asymmetries in interactions and respond more strongly to rivals that overlap the songs of their counterpart. In order to test if nightingales respond differently to two interacting rivals that are alternating songs asymmetrically (with leader–follower roles), we simulated an interaction using a dual-speaker design. Subjects discriminated between the simulated singing strategies and responded more intensely at the loudspeaker playing the preceding songs. This suggests that individuals whose songs precede in an interaction when there is no acoustic overlap are perceived as more serious rivals. Intense responses to the preceding songs compared with intense responses to the overlapping (non-preceding) songs in a previous study also indicate that discrimination is not the result of one specific proximate cue such as greater attention to the first- or last-heard stimulus. Thus, these results provide further evidence that by listening to asymmetries in conspecifics vocal interactions, receivers can obtain valuable information on their relative differences.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (152.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Endler J. A. Some general comments on the evolution and design of animal communication systems. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1993 May 29;340(1292):215–225. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1993.0060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Mundry R, Fischer J. Use of statistical programs for nonparametric tests of small samples often leads to incorrect P values: examples fromAnimal Behaviour. Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):256–259. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Naguib M, Todt D. Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales. Anim Behav. 1997 Dec;54(6):1535–1543. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.9997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES