Abstract
Previously developed models of reproductive skew have overlooked one of the main reasons why subordinates might remain in a group despite restricted opportunities to breed: the possibility of social queuing, i.e. acquiring dominant status in the future. Here, we present a dynamic ESS model of skew in animal societies that incorporates both immediate and future fitness consequences of the decisions taken by group members, based on their probability of surviving from one season to the next (when post-breeding survival probabilities drop to zero, our analysis reduces to the model produced by Reeve and Ratnieks in 1993, which considered only a single breeding season). This allows us to compare the delayed benefits of philopatry and the immediate opportunities for independent breeding. We show that delayed benefits greatly reduce the need for dominants to offer reproductive concessions to retain subordinates peacefully in the group. Moreover, this effect is strong enough that differences in survival have a much greater impact on the group structure than differences in other parameters, such as relatedness. When the possibility of acceding to dominant status is taken into account, groups where the dominant completely monopolizes reproduction can be stable, even if they consist of unrelated individuals, and even if subordinates have a reasonably high probability of winning a fight for dominance. Finally, we show that stable groups are possible even if association leads to a decrease in current productivity. Subordinates may still stand to gain from group membership under these circumstances, as acquiring breeding positions by queuing may be more efficient than the attempt to establish a new territory. At the same time, the dominant may be unable to exclude unwelcome subordinates, may enjoy increased survival when they are present, or may gain indirect benefits from allowing relatives to stay and queue for dominance. We conclude that reproductive skew in animal groups, ranging from eusocial insect colonies to mating aggregations (leks), will be strongly influenced by the future prospects of group members.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (237.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cant MA. A model for the evolution of reproductive skew without reproductive suppression. Anim Behav. 1998 Jan;55(1):163–169. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emlen S. T. An evolutionary theory of the family. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8092–8099. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.18.8092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Koenig W. D., Pitelka F. A., Carmen W. J., Mumme R. L., Stanback M. T. The evolution of delayed dispersal in cooperative breeders. Q Rev Biol. 1992 Jun;67(2):111–150. doi: 10.1086/417552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kuester J., Paul A. Rank relations of juvenile and subadult natal males of Barbary macaques (Macaca sylvanus) at Affenberg Salem. Folia Primatol (Basel) 1988;51(1):33–44. doi: 10.1159/000156354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- McDonald D. B., Potts W. K. Cooperative display and relatedness among males in a lek-mating bird. Science. 1994 Nov 11;266(5187):1030–1032. doi: 10.1126/science.7973654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]