Abstract
The central argument of The origin of species was that mechanical processes (inheritance of features and the differential reproduction they cause) can give rise to the appearance of design. The 'mechanical processes' are now mathematically represented by the dynamic systems of population genetics, and the appearance of design by optimization and game theory in which the individual plays the part of the maximizing agent. Establishing a precise individual-as-maximizing-agent (IMA) analogy for a population-genetics system justifies optimization approaches, and so provides a modern formal representation of the core of Darwinism. It is a hitherto unnoticed implication of recent population-genetics models that, contrary to a decades-long consensus, an IMA analogy can be found in models with stochastic environments (subject to a convexity assumption), in which individuals maximize expected reproductive value. The key is that the total reproductive value of a species must be considered as constant, so therefore reproductive value should always be calculated in relative terms. This result removes a major obstacle from the theoretical challenge to find a unifying framework which establishes the IMA analogy for all of Darwinian biology, including as special cases inclusive fitness, evolutionarily stable strategies, evolutionary life-history theory, age-structured models and sex ratio theory. This would provide a formal, mathematical justification of fruitful and widespread but 'intentional' terms in evolutionary biology, such as 'selfish', 'altruism' and 'conflict'.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (125.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Cooper W. S., Kaplan R. H. Adaptive "coin-flipping": a decision-theoretic examination of natural selection for random individual variation. J Theor Biol. 1982 Jan 7;94(1):135–151. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90336-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grafen A. Fertility and labour supply in Femina economica. J Theor Biol. 1998 Oct 7;194(3):429–455. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0796. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton W. D., Axelrod R., Tanese R. Sexual reproduction as an adaptation to resist parasites (a review). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 May;87(9):3566–3573. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.9.3566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton W. D. Selfish and spiteful behaviour in an evolutionary model. Nature. 1970 Dec 19;228(5277):1218–1220. doi: 10.1038/2281218a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hamilton W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):17–52. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammerstein P. Darwinian adaptation, population genetics and the streetcar theory of evolution. J Math Biol. 1996;34(5-6):511–532. doi: 10.1007/BF02409748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MORAN P. A. ON THE NONEXISTENCE OF ADAPTIVE TOPOGRAPHIES. Ann Hum Genet. 1964 Jun;27:383–393. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1963.tb01535.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor P. D. Inclusive fitness arguments in genetic models of behaviour. J Math Biol. 1996;34(5-6):654–674. doi: 10.1007/BF02409753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tuljapurkar S. An uncertain life: demography in random environments. Theor Popul Biol. 1989 Jun;35(3):227–294. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(89)90001-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weissing F. J. Genetic versus phenotypic models of selection: can genetics be neglected in a long-term perspective? J Math Biol. 1996;34(5-6):533–555. doi: 10.1007/BF02409749. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]