Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 May 7;266(1422):869–874. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0717

Human body odour, symmetry and attractiveness.

A Rikowski 1, K Grammer 1
PMCID: PMC1689917  PMID: 10380676

Abstract

Several studies have found body and facial symmetry as well as attractiveness to be human mate choice criteria. These characteristics are presumed to signal developmental stability. Human body odour has been shown to influence female mate choice depending on the immune system, but the question of whether smell could signal general mate quality, as do other cues, was not addressed in previous studies. We compared ratings of body odour, attractiveness, and measurements of facial and body asymmetry of 16 male and 19 female subjects. Subjects wore a T-shirt for three consecutive nights under controlled conditions. Opposite-sex raters judged the odour of the T-shirts and another group evaluated portraits of the subjects for attractiveness. We measured seven bilateral traits of the subject's body to assess body asymmetry. Facial asymmetry was examined by distance measurements of portrait photographs. The results showed a significant positive correlation between facial attractiveness and sexiness of body odour for female subjects. We found positive relationships between body odour and attractiveness and negative ones between smell and body asymmetry for males only if female odour raters were in the most fertile phase of their menstrual cycle. The outcomes are discussed in the light of different male and female reproductive strategies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (138.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Furlow F. B., Armijo-Prewitt T., Gangestad S. W., Thornhill R. Fluctuating asymmetry and psychometric intelligence. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Jun 22;264(1383):823–829. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gangestad S. W., Thornhill R. Menstrual cycle variation in women's preferences for the scent of symmetrical men. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 May 22;265(1399):927–933. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Gower D. B., Ruparelia B. A. Olfaction in humans with special reference to odorous 16-androstenes: their occurrence, perception and possible social, psychological and sexual impact. J Endocrinol. 1993 May;137(2):167–187. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1370167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Grammer K., Thornhill R. Human (Homo sapiens) facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol. 1994 Sep;108(3):233–242. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.3.233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hold B., Schleidt M. The importance of human odour in non-verbal communication. Z Tierpsychol. 1977 Mar;43(3):225–238. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1977.tb00072.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Livshits G., Kobyliansky E. Study of genetic variance in the fluctuating asymmetry of anthropometrical traits. Ann Hum Biol. 1989 Mar-Apr;16(2):121–129. doi: 10.1080/03014468700006972. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Michael R. P., Bonsall R. W., Kutner M. Volatile fatty acids, "copulins", in human vaginal secretions. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 1975;1(2):153–163. doi: 10.1016/0306-4530(75)90007-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Wedekind C., Seebeck T., Bettens F., Paepke A. J. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 22;260(1359):245–249. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES