Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Jun 7;266(1424):1189–1195. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0762

Intracommunity relationships, dispersal pattern and paternity success in a wild living community of Bonobos (Pan paniscus) determined from DNA analysis of faecal samples.

U Gerloff 1, B Hartung 1, B Fruth 1, G Hohmann 1, D Tautz 1
PMCID: PMC1689947  PMID: 10406131

Abstract

Differences in social relationships among community members are often explained by differences in genetic relationships. The current techniques of DNA analysis allow explicit testing of such a hypothesis. Here, we have analysed the genetic relationships for a community of wild bonobos (Pan paniscus) using nuclear and mitochondrial DNA markers extracted from faecal samples. Bonobos show an opportunistic and promiscuous mating behaviour, even with mates from outside the community. Nonetheless, we find that most infants were sired by resident males and that two dominant males together attained the highest paternity success. Intriguingly, the latter males are the sons of high-ranking females, suggesting an important influence of mothers on the paternity success of their sons. The molecular data support previous inferences on female dispersal and male philopatry. We find a total of five different mitochondrial haplotypes among 15 adult females, suggesting a frequent migration of females. Moreover, for most adult and subadult males in the group we find a matching mother, while this is not the case for most females, indicating that these leave the community during adolescence. Our study demonstrates that faecal samples can be a useful source for the determination of kinship in a whole community.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (557.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altmann J., Alberts S. C., Haines S. A., Dubach J., Muruthi P., Coote T., Geffen E., Cheesman D. J., Mututua R. S., Saiyalel S. N. Behavior predicts genes structure in a wild primate group. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5797–5801. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.5797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Anderson S., Bankier A. T., Barrell B. G., de Bruijn M. H., Coulson A. R., Drouin J., Eperon I. C., Nierlich D. P., Roe B. A., Sanger F. Sequence and organization of the human mitochondrial genome. Nature. 1981 Apr 9;290(5806):457–465. doi: 10.1038/290457a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boesch C. Evidence for dominant wild female chimpanzees investing more in sons. Anim Behav. 1997 Oct;54(4):811–815. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coote T., Bruford M. W. Human microsatellites applicable for analysis of genetic variation in apes and Old World monkeys. J Hered. 1996 Sep-Oct;87(5):406–410. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a023026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Foucault F., Praz F., Jaulin C., Amor-Gueret M. Experimental limits of PCR analysis of (CA)n repeat alterations. Trends Genet. 1996 Nov;12(11):450–452. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(96)99996-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gagneux P., Boesch C., Woodruff D. S. Microsatellite scoring errors associated with noninvasive genotyping based on nuclear DNA amplified from shed hair. Mol Ecol. 1997 Sep;6(9):861–868. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1997.tb00140.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gyapay G., Morissette J., Vignal A., Dib C., Fizames C., Millasseau P., Marc S., Bernardi G., Lathrop M., Weissenbach J. The 1993-94 Généthon human genetic linkage map. Nat Genet. 1994 Jun;7(2 Spec No):246–339. doi: 10.1038/ng0694supp-246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Idani G. Social relationships between immigrant and resident bonobo (Pan paniscus) females at Wamba. Folia Primatol (Basel) 1991;57(2):83–95. doi: 10.1159/000156568. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Marshall T. C., Slate J., Kruuk L. E., Pemberton J. M. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 1998 May;7(5):639–655. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Morin P. A., Moore J. J., Chakraborty R., Jin L., Goodall J., Woodruff D. S. Kin selection, social structure, gene flow, and the evolution of chimpanzees. Science. 1994 Aug 26;265(5176):1193–1201. doi: 10.1126/science.7915048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morin P. A., Wallis J., Moore J. J., Woodruff D. S. Paternity exclusion in a community of wild chimpanzees using hypervariable simple sequence repeats. Mol Ecol. 1994 Oct;3(5):469–477. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1994.tb00125.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Petri B., Päbo S., Von Haeseler A., Tautz D. Paternity assessment and population subdivision in a natural population of the larger mouse-eared bat Myotis myotis. Mol Ecol. 1997 Mar;6(3):235–242. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1997.00176.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Pusey A., Williams J., Goodall J. The influence of dominance rank on the reproductive success of female chimpanzees. Science. 1997 Aug 8;277(5327):828–831. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5327.828. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Taberlet P., Griffin S., Goossens B., Questiau S., Manceau V., Escaravage N., Waits L. P., Bouvet J. Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Aug 15;24(16):3189–3194. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.16.3189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. de Ruiter J. R., Geffen E. Relatedness of matrilines, dispersing males and social groups in long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Jan 22;265(1391):79–87. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
10406131s01.pdf (125.9KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES