Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Aug 7;266(1428):1561–1569. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0816

Microgeographical distribution of two chromosomal races of house mice in Tunisia: pattern and origin of habitat partitioning.

N Chatti 1, G Ganem 1, K Benzekri 1, J Catalan 1, J Britton-Davidian 1, K Saïd 1
PMCID: PMC1690166  PMID: 10467745

Abstract

Two chromosomal races of the house mouse occur in Tunisia, a standard morph (40St) found all over the country, and a derived morph (22Rb) occurring only in central Tunisia. In this region, habitat partitioning between the two morphs was investigated by a microgeographical analysis of their distribution, assessing habitat characteristics and demographic parameters. Results showed that the 22Rb mice always occurred in the oldest sections of towns (medinas), often extending to more recent surrounding neighbourhoods where the 40St morph was most abundant. The latter was never trapped within the medinas. The transition between the two morphs was located within cities in the more recent areas, the hybrid zone being estimated at less than 0.5 km in width by a clinal analysis of chromosomal data. Although differences between habitats exist, almost no demographic differences were found between populations of the two morphs when they occurred in the same or in different habitats. Two hypotheses are discussed to account for the origin of habitat partitioning. The first relies on competitive exclusion of the 40St mice from the medinas by the derived 22Rb mice; the second is based on stochastic processes related to historical evolution of Tunisian urban communities.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (586.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bronson F. H. The reproductive ecology of the house mouse. Q Rev Biol. 1979 Sep;54(3):265–299. doi: 10.1086/411295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fraguedakis-Tsolis S., Hauffe H. C., Searle J. B. Genetic distinctiveness of a village population of house mice: relevance to speciation and chromosomal evolution. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Mar 22;264(1380):355–360. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Lee M. R., Elder F. F. Yeast stimulation of bone marrow mitosis for cytogenetic investigations. Cytogenet Cell Genet. 1980;26(1):36–40. doi: 10.1159/000131419. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Said K., Saad A., Auffray J. C., Britton-Davidian J. Fertility estimates in the Tunisian all-acrocentric and Robertsonian populations of the house mouse and their chromosomal hybrids. Heredity (Edinb) 1993 Nov;71(Pt 5):532–538. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1993.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Searle J. B., Navarro Y. N., Ganem G. Further studies of a staggered hybrid zone in Mus musculus domesticus (the house mouse). Heredity (Edinb) 1993 Nov;71(Pt 5):523–531. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1993.171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. White M. J. Models of speciation. New concepts suggest that the classical sympatric and allopatric models are not the only alternatives. Science. 1968 Mar 8;159(3819):1065–1070. doi: 10.1126/science.159.3819.1065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES