Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Aug 22;266(1429):1655–1661. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0828

Early determinants of lifetime reproductive success differ between the sexes in red deer.

L E Kruuk 1, T H Clutton-Brock 1, K E Rose 1, F E Guinness 1
PMCID: PMC1690188  PMID: 10501037

Abstract

In polygynous, sexually dimorphic species, sexual selection should be stronger in males than in females. Although this prediction extends to the effects of early development on fitness, few studies have documented early determinants of lifetime reproductive success in a natural mammal population. In this paper, we describe factors affecting the reproductive success of male and female red deer (Cervus elaphus) on the island of Rum, Scotland. Birthweight was a significant determinant of total lifetime reproductive success in males, with heavier-born males being more successful than lighter ones. In contrast, birthweight did not affect female reproductive success. High population density and cold spring temperatures in the year of birth decreased several components of fitness in females, but did not affect the breeding success of males. The results confirm the prediction that selection on a sexually dimorphic trait should be greater in males than in females, and explain the differential maternal expenditure between sons and daughters observed in red deer. Differences between the sexes in the effects of environmental and phenotypic variation on fitness may generate differences in the amount of heritable genetic variation underlying traits such as birthweight.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (184.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clutton-Brock T. H., Rose K. E., Guinness F. E. Density-related changes in sexual selection in red deer. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1509–1516. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kruuk L. E., Clutton-Brock T. H., Albon S. D., Pemberton J. M., Guinness F. E. Population density affects sex ratio variation in red deer. Nature. 1999 Jun 3;399(6735):459–461. doi: 10.1038/20917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Trivers R. L., Willard D. E. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90–92. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4068.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
10501037s01.pdf (9.7KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES