Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Oct 7;266(1432):1995–2002. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0877

Kin discrimination and female mate choice in the naked mole-rat Heterocephalus glaber.

F M Clarke 1, C G Faulkes 1
PMCID: PMC1690316  PMID: 10584337

Abstract

Naked mole-rats are fossorial, eusocial rodents that naturally exhibit high levels of inbreeding. Persistent inbreeding in animals often results in a substantial decline in fitness and, thus, dispersal and avoidance of kin as mates are two common inbreeding avoidance mechanisms. In the naked mole-rat evidence for the former has recently been found. Here we address the latter mechanism by investigating kin recognition and female mate choice using a series of choice tests in which the odour, social and mate preferences of females were determined. Discrimination by females appears to be dependent on their reproductive status. Reproductively active females prefer to associate with unfamiliar males, whereas reproductively inactive females do not discriminate. Females do not discriminate between kin and non-kin suggesting that the criterion for recognition is familiarity, not detection of genetic similarity per se. In the wild, naked mole-rats occupy discrete burrow systems and dispersal and mixing with non-kin is thought to be comparatively rare. Thus, recognition by familiarity may function as a highly efficient kin recognition mechanism in the naked mole-rat. A preference by reproductively active females for unfamiliar males is interpreted as inbreeding avoidance. These findings suggest that, despite an evolutionary history of close inbreeding, naked mole-rats may not be exempt from the effects of inbreeding depression and will attempt to outbreed should the opportunity arise.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (139.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barrett S. C., Charlesworth D. Effects of a change in the level of inbreeding on the genetic load. Nature. 1991 Aug 8;352(6335):522–524. doi: 10.1038/352522a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Burda H. Individual recognition and incest avoidance in eusocial common mole-rats rather than reproductive suppression by parents. Experientia. 1995 Apr 15;51(4):411–413. doi: 10.1007/BF01928906. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clarke F. M., Faulkes C. G. Dominance and queen succession in captive colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus glaber. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Jul 22;264(1384):993–1000. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0137. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Clarke F. M., Faulkes C. G. Hormonal and behavioural correlates of male dominance and reproductive status in captive colonies of the naked mole-rat, Heterocephalus glaber. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Aug 7;265(1404):1391–1399. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Faulkes C. G., Abbott D. H., Jarvis J. U. Social suppression of ovarian cyclicity in captive and wild colonies of naked mole-rats, Heterocephalus glaber. J Reprod Fertil. 1990 Mar;88(2):559–568. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0880559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Faulkes C. G., Abbott D. H., O'Brien H. P., Lau L., Roy M. R., Wayne R. K., Bruford M. W. Micro- and macrogeographical genetic structure of colonies of naked mole-rats Heterocephalus glaber. Mol Ecol. 1997 Jul;6(7):615–628. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1997.00227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Faulkes C. G., Abbott D. H. Social control of reproduction in breeding and non-breeding male naked mole-rats (Heterocephalus glaber). J Reprod Fertil. 1991 Nov;93(2):427–435. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.0930427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hamilton W. D. The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol. 1964 Jul;7(1):1–16. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Jarvis J. U. Eusociality in a mammal: cooperative breeding in naked mole-rat colonies. Science. 1981 May 1;212(4494):571–573. doi: 10.1126/science.7209555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jordan W. C., Bruford M. W. New perspectives on mate choice and the MHC. Heredity (Edinb) 1998 Aug;81(Pt 2):127–133. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1998.00428.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Manning C. J., Wakeland E. K., Potts W. K. Communal nesting patterns in mice implicate MHC genes in kin recognition. Nature. 1992 Dec 10;360(6404):581–583. doi: 10.1038/360581a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. O'Riain M. J., Jarvis J. U., Faulkes C. G. A dispersive morph in the naked mole-rat. Nature. 1996 Apr 18;380(6575):619–621. doi: 10.1038/380619a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Potts W. K., Manning C. J., Wakeland E. K. Mating patterns in seminatural populations of mice influenced by MHC genotype. Nature. 1991 Aug 15;352(6336):619–621. doi: 10.1038/352619a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Potts W. K., Manning C. J., Wakeland E. K. The role of infectious disease, inbreeding and mating preferences in maintaining MHC genetic diversity: an experimental test. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994 Nov 29;346(1317):369–378. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Reeve H. K., Westneat D. F., Noon W. A., Sherman P. W., Aquadro C. F. DNA "fingerprinting" reveals high levels of inbreeding in colonies of the eusocial naked mole-rat. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990 Apr;87(7):2496–2500. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.7.2496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Van Damme M. P., Robertson D. M., Diczfalusy E. An improved in vitro bioassay method for measuring luteinizing hormone (LH) activity using mouse Leydig cell preparations. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 1974 Dec;77(4):655–671. doi: 10.1530/acta.0.0770655. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Wedekind C., Füri S. Body odour preferences in men and women: do they aim for specific MHC combinations or simply heterozygosity? Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Oct 22;264(1387):1471–1479. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Wedekind C., Seebeck T., Bettens F., Paepke A. J. MHC-dependent mate preferences in humans. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 22;260(1359):245–249. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Zavazava N., Eggert F. MHC and behavior. Immunol Today. 1997 Jan;18(1):8–10. doi: 10.1016/s0167-5699(97)80006-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES