Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Nov 7;266(1434):2195–2200. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0908

Does interspecific hybridization influence evolutionary rates? An experimental study of laboratory adaptation in hybrids between Drosophila serrata and Drosophila birchii.

M J Hercus 1, A A Hoffmann 1
PMCID: PMC1690337  PMID: 10649634

Abstract

The low initial fitness of progeny from interspecific crosses in animals and the rarity of interspecific hybridization in natural environments have led to a debate about the evolutionary importance of this phenomenon. Here we directly assess the effects of hybridization between Drosophila serrata and Drosophila birchii on evolutionary rates. We looked at the effects on laboratory adaptation over 30 generations in two laboratory environments, one of which involved nutrition and temperature stress. Laboratory adaptation occurred over time in both environments as reflected by a marked change in viability. However, whilst hybrid lines at no stage performed poorly relative to parental lines, their rate of adaptation never exceeded that of the parentals. Thus, there was no evidence that hybridization increased evolutionary rates. Instead, hybrid lines converged phenotypically with one of the parental species.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (130.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. AYALA R. J. RELATIVE FITNESS OF POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA SERRATA AND DROSOPHILA BIRCHII. Genetics. 1965 Apr;51:527–544. doi: 10.1093/genetics/51.4.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Baimai V. Chromosomal polymorphism in Drosophila birchii. J Hered. 1970 Jan-Feb;61(1):22–34. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Carson H. L., Nair P. S., Sene F. M. Drosophila hybrids in nature: proof of gene exchange between sympatric species. Science. 1975 Sep 5;189(4205):806–807. doi: 10.1126/science.1162353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Coyne J. A., Orr H. A. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1998 Feb 28;353(1366):287–305. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0210. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Flechtner H., Queisser W., Heim M. E., Henss H., Arnold H., Fritze D., Herrmann R., Fritsch H., Fritz M., Trux F. A. 5-Fluorouracil, 4-epidoxorubicin, and mitomycin C (FEM) combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric carcinoma. A phase-II trial by the "chemotherapiegruppe gastrointestinaler tumoren (CGT)". Onkologie. 1987 Apr;10(2):67–71. doi: 10.1159/000216375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hercus M. J., Hoffmann A. A. Desiccation resistance in interspecific Drosophila crosses. Genetic interactions and trait correlations. Genetics. 1999 Apr;151(4):1493–1502. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.4.1493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Orr H. A., Coyne J. A. The genetics of postzygotic isolation in the Drosophila virilis group. Genetics. 1989 Mar;121(3):527–537. doi: 10.1093/genetics/121.3.527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Rieseberg LH, Sinervo B, Linder CR, Ungerer MC, Arias DM. Role of Gene Interactions in Hybrid Speciation: Evidence from Ancient and Experimental Hybrids. Science. 1996 May 3;272(5262):741–745. doi: 10.1126/science.272.5262.741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wu C. I., Beckenbach A. T. Evidence for Extensive Genetic Differentiation between the Sex-Ratio and the Standard Arrangement of DROSOPHILA PSEUDOOBSCURA and D. PERSIMILIS and Identification of Hybrid Sterility Factors. Genetics. 1983 Sep;105(1):71–86. doi: 10.1093/genetics/105.1.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES