Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Nov 22;266(1435):2309. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0924

Is female preference for male repertoires due to sensory bias?

S A Collins
PMCID: PMC1690447

Abstract

There are several possible explanations for the female preference for male repertoires in birds. These males are older, and have better territories; thus there are functional reasons for females to prefer these males. However, there is an alternative explanation; females may habituate less quickly to song repertoires than single songs. I tested whether females have a non-functional, sensory bias for male song repertoires, by testing female preference for a repertoire in zebra finches (Taenopygia guttata), a species in which males possess a single stereotyped song. Females chose between a male repertoire of four different phrases created from the song phrase of one individual and that of one of those phrases repeated four times (natural zebra finch song). Females were also given a choice between the above repertoire and a song made from the phrases of four related males ('family' stimulus). I tested female preference by training females to press a button for presentation of a song stimulus, and counting the number of button presses. Females preferred the song repertoire to a single phrase song, and did not differentiate between the repertoire and song phrases from four males. Evidence from the Estrildidae indicates that having a single song is the ancestral state for zebra finches, so the preference is not ancestral.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (194.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Devoogd T. J., Krebs J. R., Healy S. D., Purvis A. Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song: comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Nov 22;254(1340):75–82. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Gentner TQ, Hulse SH. Perceptual mechanisms for individual vocal recognition in European starlings, Sturnus vulgaris. Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):579–594. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. MacDougall-Shackleton S. A., Hulse S. H., Ball G. F. Neural correlates of singing behavior in male zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). J Neurobiol. 1998 Sep 5;36(3):421–430. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0074. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  5. Riebel K, Slater PJB. Testing female chaffinch song preferences by operant conditioning. Anim Behav. 1998 Dec;56(6):1443–1453. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ryan M. J. Sexual selection, receiver biases, and the evolution of sex differences. Science. 1998 Sep 25;281(5385):1999–2003. doi: 10.1126/science.281.5385.1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Searcy W. A., Marler P. A test for responsiveness to song structure and programming in female sparrows. Science. 1981 Aug 21;213(4510):926–928. doi: 10.1126/science.213.4510.926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Vallet E, Beme I, I, Kreutzer M. Two-note syllables in canary songs elicit high levels of sexual display. Anim Behav. 1998 Feb;55(2):291–297. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Ward B. C., Nordeen E. J., Nordeen K. W. Individual variation in neuron number predicts differences in the propensity for avian vocal imitation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):1277–1282. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES