Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Nov 22;266(1435):2315. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0925

Immunocompetence of nestling great tits in relation to rearing environment and parentage

M W G Brinkhof, P Heeb, M K lliker, H Richner
PMCID: PMC1690459

Abstract

Theoretical models of host–parasite coevolution assume a partially genetic basis to the variability in susceptibility to parasites among hosts, for instance as a result of genetic variation in immune function. However, few empirical data exist for free-living vertebrate hosts to support this presumption. In a cross-fostering experiment with nestling great tits, by comparing nestlings of the same origin we investigated (i) the variance in host resistance against an ectoparasite due to a common genetic origin, (ii) the effect of ectoparasite infestation on cell-mediated immunity and (iii) the variance in cell-mediated immunity due to a common genetic origin. Ectoparasitic hen fleas can impair the growth of nestling great tits and nestling growth was therefore taken as a measure of host susceptibility. A common origin did not account for a significant part of the variation in host susceptibility to fleas. There was no significant overall effect of fleas on nestling growth or cell-mediated immunity, as assessed by a cutaneous hypersensitivity response. A common rearing environment explained a significant part of the variation in cell-mediated immunity among nestlings, mainly through its effect on nestling body mass. The variation in cell-mediated immunity was also related to a common origin. However, the origin-related variation in body mass did not account for the origin-related differences in cell-mediated immunity. The results of the present study thus suggest heritable variation in cell-mediated immunity among nestling great tits.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (151.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baron R. W., Weintraub J. Immunological responses to parasitic arthropods. Parasitol Today. 1987 Mar;3(3):77–82. doi: 10.1016/0169-4758(87)90163-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cheng S., Lamont S. J. Genetic analysis of immunocompetence measures in a White Leghorn chicken line. Poult Sci. 1988 Jul;67(7):989–995. doi: 10.3382/ps.0670989. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Clare R. A., Strout R. G., Taylor R. L., Jr, Collins W. M., Briles W. E. Major histocompatibility (B) complex effects on acquired immunity to cecal coccidiosis. Immunogenetics. 1985;22(6):593–599. doi: 10.1007/BF00430307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Goto N., Kodama H., Okada K., Fujimoto Y. Suppression of phytohemagglutinin skin response in thymectomized chickens. Poult Sci. 1978 Jan;57(1):246–250. doi: 10.3382/ps.0570246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Gross W. G., Siegel P. B., Hall R. W., Domermuth C. H., DuBoise R. T. Production and persistence of antibodies in chickens to sheep erythrocytes. 2. Resistance to infectious diseases. Poult Sci. 1980 Feb;59(2):205–210. doi: 10.3382/ps.0590205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Hamilton W. D., Zuk M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):384–387. doi: 10.1126/science.7123238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Heeb P., Werner I., Mateman A. C., Kölliker M., Brinkhof M. W., Lessells C. M., Richner H. Ectoparasite infestation and sex-biased local recruitment of hosts. Nature. 1999 Jul 1;400(6739):63–65. doi: 10.1038/21881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  10. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  11. Saino N., Bolzern A. M., Møller A. P. Immunocompetence, ornamentation, and viability of male barn swallows (Hirundo rustica). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Jan 21;94(2):549–552. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.2.549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Taylor R. L., Jr, Cotter P. F., Wing T. L., Briles W. E. Major histocompatibility (B) complex and sex effects on the phytohaemagglutinin wattle response. Anim Genet. 1987;18(4):343–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.1987.tb00778.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Tripet F., Richner H. The coevolutionary potential of a 'generalist' parasite, the hen flea Ceratophyllus gallinae. Parasitology. 1997 Oct;115(Pt 4):419–427. doi: 10.1017/s0031182097001467. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES