Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Dec 7;266(1436):2399–2402. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0937

Sibling competition stabilizes signalling resolution models of parent-offspring conflict.

M A Rodríguez-Gironés 1
PMCID: PMC1690465  PMID: 10643084

Abstract

Young of altricial birds use conspicuous displays to solicit food from their parents. There is experimental evidence that the intensity of these displays is correlated with the level of food deprivation of young, and that parents respond to increased levels of solicitation by increasing the rate of food delivery to the nest. Game-theoretical models based on the handicap principle show that, when solicitation is costly, there is a signalling equilibrium at which there is a one-to-one correspondence between the condition of the young and the intensity of their display. Parents use this information to adjust their levels of investment on the current offspring. However, the models also have a non-signalling equilibrium, and computer simulations show that only the non-signalling equilibrium is stable. Here I show that when direct sibling competition is introduced into the model, in such a way that parents have control on the amount of food provided to the nest, but not on the way the food is allocated among siblings, the non-signalling equilibrium disappears and the signalling equilibrium becomes stable.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (95.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Getty T. Handicap signalling: when fecundity and viability do not add up. Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):127–130. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Grafen A. Biological signals as handicaps. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):517–546. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80088-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Grafen A. Sexual selection unhandicapped by the Fisher process. J Theor Biol. 1990 Jun 21;144(4):473–516. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80087-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Lachmann M., Bergstrom C. T. Signalling among relatives. II. Beyond the tower of Babel. Theor Popul Biol. 1998 Oct;54(2):146–160. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0041. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Payne RJ, Rodriguez-Girones MA. The origins of parent-offspring signalling . J Theor Biol. 1998 Nov 21;195(2):273–280. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1998.0798. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rodríguez-Gironés M. A., Enquist M., Cotton P. A. Instability of signaling resolution models of parent-offspring conflict. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Apr 14;95(8):4453–4457. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.8.4453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES