Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 1999 Dec 7;266(1436):2403. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0938

Geographic variation in multiple paternity within natural populations of the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)

C D Kelly, J-G J Godin, J M Wright
PMCID: PMC1690466

Abstract

Mating can increase an individual's risk of mortality by predation. In response to predation hazards, males in some species court females less often, but alternatively engage in coerced copulations more frequently and females become less selective. Such predator-mediated shifts in mating tactics may result in higher levels of multiple inseminations in females and, thus, in greater frequencies of females with broods of mixed paternity. We tested this hypothesis using two polymorphic microsatellite loci to estimate conservatively multiple paternity in broods of female guppies (Poecilia reticulata) originating from ten natural populations that have evolved under different fish predation regimes in Trinidad. The frequency of broods that were multiply sired was significantly greater on average in populations experiencing high predation pressure compared to populations experiencing a relatively low predation risk. These results suggest that the intensity of male sperm competition covaries geographically with predation pressure in this species and that the local risk of predation mediates the opportunity for sexual selection within populations.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (126.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Foster SA. The geography of behaviour: an evolutionary perspective. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 May;14(5):190–195. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01577-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. MOL A., SOKOLOWSKI A. W sprawie metodyki badania zmian czynnościowych w mieśniach w goścu przewlekłym postepujacym. Acta Physiol Pol. 1956;7(3):359–363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Magurran A. E., Nowak M. A. Another battle of the sexes: the consequences of sexual asymmetry in mating costs and predation risk in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Proc Biol Sci. 1991 Oct 22;246(1315):31–38. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1991.0121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Nei M., Roychoudhury A. K. Sampling variances of heterozygosity and genetic distance. Genetics. 1974 Feb;76(2):379–390. doi: 10.1093/genetics/76.2.379. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1998.0209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. Paetkau D., Calvert W., Stirling I., Strobeck C. Microsatellite analysis of population structure in Canadian polar bears. Mol Ecol. 1995 Jun;4(3):347–354. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00227.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Pomiankowski A. The costs of choice in sexual selection. J Theor Biol. 1987 Sep 21;128(2):195–218. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(87)80169-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Taylor J. S., Durkin J. M., Breden F. The death of a microsatellite: a phylogenetic perspective on microsatellite interruptions. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Apr;16(4):567–572. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES