Abstract
Female mammals bear the energetic costs of gestation and lactation. Therefore, it is often assumed that the overall energetic costs are greater for females than they are for males. However, the energetic costs to males of intrasex competition may also be considerable, particularly if males maintain a much larger body size than females. Using data from 19 non-human primates, this paper examines the relationship between male and female energetic costs both in the short term (daily energy expenditure) and the long term (the energetic cost of producing a single offspring). It is shown that the major determinant of sex differences in energetic costs is body size dimorphism. In the long term, the energetic costs are often greater for females, but, when male body size exceeds female body size by 60% or more, male energetic costs are greater than those for females. That is, in highly sexually dimorphic species the energetic costs of gestation and lactation for the females are matched by the energetic costs to the males of maintaining a large body size.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (137.0 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bercovitch F. B., Nürnberg P. Socioendocrine and morphological correlates of paternity in rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta). J Reprod Fertil. 1996 May;107(1):59–68. doi: 10.1530/jrf.0.1070059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kirkwood J. K., Underwood S. J. Energy requirements of captive cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus oedipus). Folia Primatol (Basel) 1984;42(3-4):180–187. doi: 10.1159/000156160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kurland J. A., Pearson J. D. Ecological significance of hypometabolism in nonhuman primates: allometry, adaptation, and deviant diets. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1986 Dec;71(4):445–457. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330710408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leonard W. R., Robertson M. L. Comparative primate energetics and hominid evolution. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1997 Feb;102(2):265–281. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-8644(199702)102:2<265::AID-AJPA8>3.0.CO;2-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nievergelt C. M., Martin R. D. Energy intake during reproduction in captive common marmosets (Callithrix jacchus). Physiol Behav. 1999 Jan 1;65(4-5):849–854. doi: 10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00249-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sánchez S., Peláez F., Gil-Bürmann C., Kaumanns W. Costs of infant-carrying in the cotton-top tamarin (Saguinus oedipus). Am J Primatol. 1999;48(2):99–111. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1999)48:2<99::AID-AJP2>3.0.CO;2-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor C. R., Schmidt-Nielsen K., Raab J. L. Scaling of energetic cost of running to body size in mammals. Am J Physiol. 1970 Oct;219(4):1104–1107. doi: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1970.219.4.1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tilden C. D., Oftedal O. T. Milk composition reflects pattern of maternal care in prosimian primates. Am J Primatol. 1997;41(3):195–211. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2345(1997)41:3<195::AID-AJP3>3.0.CO;2-S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.