Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Jan 7;267(1438):31–35. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.0962

Longevity and the costs of reproduction in a historical human population.

J E Lycett 1, R I Dunbar 1, E Voland 1
PMCID: PMC1690499  PMID: 10670949

Abstract

It has been argued that the priority that natural selection places on reproduction negatively affects other processes such as longevity and the problem posed by this trade-off underlies the disposable soma theory for the evolution of human ageing. Here we examine the relationship between reproduction and longevity in a historical human population (the Krummhörn, north-west Germany 1720-1870). In our initial analyses, we found no support for the hypothesized negative effects of reproduction on longevity: married women who remained childless lived no longer than women who reproduced and women who had few children lived no longer than women who had many children. However, more detailed analyses in relation to socio-economic class revealed that the extent to which reproduction has an effect on longevity is a function of the level of economic deprivation. We found that, when possible sources of confound were controlled for (e.g. duration of marriage and amount of time spent in fecund marriage), there is an increasingly strong relationship between longevity and reproduction with increasing poverty.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (158.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Chapman T., Liddle L. F., Kalb J. M., Wolfner M. F., Partridge L. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature. 1995 Jan 19;373(6511):241–244. doi: 10.1038/373241a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Chapman T., Miyatake T., Smith H. K., Partridge L. Interactions of mating, egg production and death rates in females of the Mediterranean fruit fly, Ceratitis capitata. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Oct 7;265(1408):1879–1894. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0516. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kirkwood T. B. Evolution of ageing. Nature. 1977 Nov 24;270(5635):301–304. doi: 10.1038/270301a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kirkwood T. B., Rose M. R. Evolution of senescence: late survival sacrificed for reproduction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1991 Apr 29;332(1262):15–24. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1991.0028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lund E. Mortality from ovarian cancer among women with many children. Int J Epidemiol. 1992 Oct;21(5):872–876. doi: 10.1093/ije/21.5.872. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Perls T. T., Alpert L., Fretts R. C. Middle-aged mothers live longer. Nature. 1997 Sep 11;389(6647):133–133. doi: 10.1038/38148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Voland E. Evolutionary ecology of human reproduction. Annu Rev Anthropol. 1998;27:347–374. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.27.1.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Westendorp R. G., Kirkwood T. B. Human longevity at the cost of reproductive success. Nature. 1998 Dec 24;396(6713):743–746. doi: 10.1038/25519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES