Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Jan 7;267(1438):69–73. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.0968

Sex-ratio-distorting Wolbachia causes sex-role reversal in its butterfly host.

F M Jiggins 1, G D Hurst 1, M E Majerus 1
PMCID: PMC1690502  PMID: 10670955

Abstract

Sex-role-reversed mating systems in which females compete for males and males may be choosy are usually associated with males investing more than females in offspring. We report that sex-role reversal may also be caused by selfish genetic elements which distort the sex ratio towards females. Some populations of the butterflies Acraea encedon and Acraea encedana are extremely female biased because over 90% of females are infected with a Wolbachia bacterium that is maternally inherited and kills male embryos. Many females in these populations are virgins suggesting that their reproductive success may be limited by access to males. These females form lekking swarms at landmarks in which females exhibit behaviours which we interpret as functioning to solicit matings from males. The hypothesis that female A. encedon swarm in order to mate is supported by the finding that, in release recapture experiments, mated females tend to leave the swarm while unmated females remained. This behaviour is a sex-role-reversed form of a common mating system in insects in which males form lekking swarms at landmarks and compete for females. Female lekking swarms are absent from less female-biased populations and here the butterflies are instead associated with resources in the form of the larval food plant.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (117.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clutton-Brock T. H. Mammalian mating systems. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1989 May 22;236(1285):339–372. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1989.0027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Clutton-Brock T. H., Vincent A. C. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature. 1991 May 2;351(6321):58–60. doi: 10.1038/351058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Harris W. F. Dislocations in tobacco mosaic virus. Nature. 1973 Jul 13;244(5411):116–116. doi: 10.1038/244116a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hillis D. M., Dixon M. T. Ribosomal DNA: molecular evolution and phylogenetic inference. Q Rev Biol. 1991 Dec;66(4):411–453. doi: 10.1086/417338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ims R. A. Spatial clumping of sexually receptive females induces space sharing among male voles. Nature. 1988 Oct 6;335(6190):541–543. doi: 10.1038/335541a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0698. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  8. Walsh P. S., Metzger D. A., Higuchi R. Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques. 1991 Apr;10(4):506–513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhou W., Rousset F., O'Neil S. Phylogeny and PCR-based classification of Wolbachia strains using wsp gene sequences. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Mar 22;265(1395):509–515. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES