Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Feb 7;267(1440):243–249. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.0993

Coalitions of relatives and reproductive skew in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs.

R Heinsohn 1, P Dunn 1, S Legge 1, M Double 1
PMCID: PMC1690523  PMID: 10714878

Abstract

We used DNA fingerprinting to examine reproductive skew in cooperatively breeding white-winged choughs, Corcorax melanorhamphos, which live in groups of up to 20 individuals. Before a severe drought, groups that had been stable for multiple years were characterized by long-term monogamy involving a single breeding pair (high skew). After the drought, new groups formed from the amalgamation of multiple individuals and coalitions of relatives. At most one member of each faction succeeded in breeding, such that skew was dependent on the number of unrelated factions, and not group size. In the new groups, dominant males and females with supporting relatives were always successful. Whereas most females without support also gained breeding positions, many males without family support failed to breed. Thus subordinates gain indirect fitness by first helping related males to secure a breeding position, and then helping to raise their young. Our study demonstrates the advantage of operating in coalitions, and suggests that the acquisition of future allies may be a major benefit of helping behaviour in this species.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (219.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Burke T., Bruford M. W. DNA fingerprinting in birds. Nature. 1987 May 14;327(6118):149–152. doi: 10.1038/327149a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cant MA. A model for the evolution of reproductive skew without reproductive suppression. Anim Behav. 1998 Jan;55(1):163–169. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Griffiths R., Double M. C., Orr K., Dawson R. J. A DNA test to sex most birds. Mol Ecol. 1998 Aug;7(8):1071–1075. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00389.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Heinsohn R., Packer C. Complex cooperative strategies in group-territorial African lions. Science. 1995 Sep 1;269(5228):1260–1262. doi: 10.1126/science.7652573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jeffreys A. J., Wilson V., Thein S. L. Individual-specific 'fingerprints' of human DNA. Nature. 1985 Jul 4;316(6023):76–79. doi: 10.1038/316076a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shin H. S., Bargiello T. A., Clark B. T., Jackson F. R., Young M. W. An unusual coding sequence from a Drosophila clock gene is conserved in vertebrates. Nature. 1985 Oct 3;317(6036):445–448. doi: 10.1038/317445a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES