Abstract
We estimated and modelled how uncertainties in stochastic population dynamics and biases in parameter estimates affect the accuracy of the projections of a small island population of song sparrows which was enumerated every spring for 24 years. The estimate of the density regulation in a theta-logistic model (theta = 1.09 suggests that the dynamics are nearly logistic, with specific growth rate r1 = 0.99 and carrying capacity K = 41.54. The song sparrow population was strongly influenced by demographic (ŝigma2(d) = 0.66) and environmental (ŝigma2(d) = 0.41) stochasticity. Bootstrap replicates of the different parameters revealed that the uncertainties in the estimates of the specific growth rate r1 and the density regulation theta were larger than the uncertainties in the environmental variance sigma2(e) and the carrying capacity K. We introduce the concept of the population prediction interval (PPI), which is a stochastic interval which includes the unknown population size with probability (1 - alpha). The width of the PPI increased rapidly with time because of uncertainties in the estimates of density regulation as well as demographic and environmental variance in the stochastic population dynamics. Accepting a 10% probability of extinction within 100 years, neglecting uncertainties in the parameters will lead to a 33% overestimation of the time it takes for the extinction barrier (population size X = 1) to be included into the PPI. This study shows that ignoring uncertainties in population dynamics produces a substantial underestimation of the extinction risk.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (219.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Arcese P., Smith J. N., Hatch M. I. Nest predation by cowbirds and its consequences for passerine demography. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996 May 14;93(10):4608–4611. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.10.4608. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gilpin M. E., Ayala F. J. Global models of growth and competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3590–3593. doi: 10.1073/pnas.70.12.3590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Heyde C. C., Cohen J. E. Confidence intervals for demographic projections based on products of random matrices. Theor Popul Biol. 1985 Apr;27(2):120–153. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(85)90007-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leigh E. G., Jr The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment. J Theor Biol. 1981 May 21;90(2):213–239. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(81)90044-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- May R. M. Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics. Nature. 1976 Jun 10;261(5560):459–467. doi: 10.1038/261459a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Saether B., Tufto J., Engen S., Jerstad K., Rostad O. W., Skâtan J. E. Population dynamical consequences of climate change for a small temperate songbird. Science. 2000 Feb 4;287(5454):854–856. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5454.854. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Turelli M. Random environments and stochastic calculus. Theor Popul Biol. 1977 Oct;12(2):140–178. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(77)90040-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]