Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Mar 22;267(1443):613–620. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1046

Phylogenetically patterned speciation rates and extinction risks change the loss of evolutionary history during extinctions.

S B Heard 1, A O Mooers 1
PMCID: PMC1690578  PMID: 10787167

Abstract

If we are to plan conservation strategies that minimize the loss of evolutionary history through human-caused extinctions, we must understand how this loss is related to phylogenetic patterns in current extinction risks and past speciation rates. Nee & May (1997, Science 278, 692-694) showed that for a randomly evolving clade (i) a single round of random extinction removed relatively little evolutionary history, and (ii) extinction management (choosing which taxa to sacrifice) offered only marginal improvement. However, both speciation rates and extinction risks vary across lineages within real clades. We simulated evolutionary trees with phylogenetically patterned speciation rates and extinction risks (closely related lineages having similar rates and risks) and then subjected them to several biologically informed models of extinction. Increasing speciation rate variation increases the extinction-management pay-off. When extinction risks vary among lineages but are uncorrelated with speciation rates, extinction removes more history (compared with random trees), but the difference is small. When extinction risks vary and are correlated with speciation rates, history loss can dramatically increase (negative correlation) or decrease (positive correlation) with speciation rate variation. The loss of evolutionary history via human-caused extinctions may therefore be more severe, yet more manageable, than first suggested.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (368.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Altschul S. F., Lipman D. J. Equal animals. Nature. 1990 Dec 6;348(6301):493–494. doi: 10.1038/348493c0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Benton M. J. Diversification and extinction in the history of life. Science. 1995 Apr 7;268(5207):52–58. doi: 10.1126/science.7701342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bininda-Emonds O. R., Gittleman J. L., Purvis A. Building large trees by combining phylogenetic information: a complete phylogeny of the extant Carnivora (Mammalia). Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1999 May;74(2):143–175. doi: 10.1017/s0006323199005307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gittleman J. L., Purvis A. Body size and species-richness in carnivores and primates. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Jan 22;265(1391):113–119. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hewzulla D., Boulter M. C., Benton M. J., Halley J. M. Evolutionary patterns from mass originations and mass extinctions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1999 Feb 28;354(1382):463–469. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jablonski D. Background and mass extinctions: the alternation of macroevolutionary regimes. Science. 1986 Jan 10;231(4734):129–133. doi: 10.1126/science.231.4734.129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Jablonski D. Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographic ranges of cretaceous mollusks. Science. 1987 Oct 16;238(4825):360–363. doi: 10.1126/science.238.4825.360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Nee S., May R. M. Extinction and the loss of evolutionary history. Science. 1997 Oct 24;278(5338):692–694. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5338.692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Nee S., Mooers A. O., Harvey P. H. Tempo and mode of evolution revealed from molecular phylogenies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Sep 1;89(17):8322–8326. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.17.8322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  11. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  12. Raup D. M. Size of the permo-triassic bottleneck and its evolutionary implications. Science. 1979 Oct 12;206(4415):217–218. doi: 10.1126/science.206.4415.217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Stanley S. M. A theory of evolution above the species level. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1975 Feb;72(2):646–650. doi: 10.1073/pnas.72.2.646. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Vázquez D. P., Gittleman J. L. Biodiversity conservation: does phylogeny matter? Curr Biol. 1998 May 21;8(11):R379–R381. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70242-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES