Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Apr 7;267(1444):677–680. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1055

The Bateman gradient and the cause of sexual selection in a sex-role-reversed pipefish.

A G Jones 1, G Rosenqvist 1, A Berglund 1, S J Arnold 1, J C Avise 1
PMCID: PMC1690589  PMID: 10821612

Abstract

As a conspicuous evolutionary mechanism, sexual selection has received much attention from theorists and empiricists. Although the importance of the mating system to sexual selection has long been appreciated, the precise relationship remains obscure. In a classic experimental study based on parentage assessment using visible genetic markers, more than 50 years ago A. J. Bateman proposed that the cause of sexual selection in Drosophila is 'the stronger correlation, in males (relative to females), between number of mates and fertility (number of progeny)'. Half a century later, molecular genetic techniques for assigning parentage now permit mirror-image experimental tests of the 'Bateman gradient' using sex-role-reversed species. Here we show that, in the male-pregnant pipefish Syngnathus typhle, females exhibit a stronger positive association between number of mates and fertility than do males and that this relationship responds in the predicted fashion to changes in the adult sex ratio. These findings give empirical support to the idea that the relationship between mating success and number of progeny, as characterized by the Bateman gradient, is a central feature of the genetic mating system affecting the strength and direction of sexual selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (157.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clutton-Brock T. H., Vincent A. C. Sexual selection and the potential reproductive rates of males and females. Nature. 1991 May 2;351(6321):58–60. doi: 10.1038/351058a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Owens I. P., Thompson D. B. Sex differences, sex ratios and sex roles. Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Nov 22;258(1352):93–99. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES