Skip to main content
PMC home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Apr 7;267(1444):687–694. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1057

The consequences of inbreeding for recognizing competitors.

C M Nevison 1, C J Barnard 1, R J Beynon 1, J L Hurst 1
PMCID: PMC1690593  PMID: 10821614

Abstract

Extreme inbreeding will compromise an animal's ability to discriminate between individuals and, thus, assess familiarity and kinship with conspecifics. In rodents, a large component of individual recognition is mediated through chemical communication. The counter-marking of competitor males' scent marks provides a measure of discrimination between their own scent and that from other individuals. We investigated whether males in common outbred (ICR(CD-1) and TO) and inbred (BALB/c) strains of laboratory mice could recognize the urinary scents of other individuals by measuring their investigation and counter-marking responses. Dominant males of outbred strains investigated and counter-marked scents from other males, whether of the same or another strain. Dominant inbred BALB/c males investigated but did not counter-mark their own strain scents, counter-marking only those from another strain. They did not use environmentally induced status differences in odours to recognize scents from other males. The inability of the inbred mice to discriminate between their own scent marks and those of other males is likely to alter their competitive behaviour, which could influence responses in experiments and the welfare of caged laboratory mice.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (223.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Apanius V., Penn D., Slev P. R., Ruff L. R., Potts W. K. The nature of selection on the major histocompatibility complex. Crit Rev Immunol. 1997;17(2):179–224. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.v17.i2.40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnard C. J., Hurst J. L., Aldhous P. Of mice and kin: the functional significance of kin bias in social behaviour. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1991 Nov;66(4):379–430. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1991.tb01147.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brown R. E., Singh P. B., Roser B. The major histocompatibility complex and the chemosensory recognition of individuality in rats. Physiol Behav. 1987;40(1):65–73. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(87)90186-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Brown R. E. What is the role of the immune system in determining individually distinct body odours? Int J Immunopharmacol. 1995 Aug;17(8):655–661. doi: 10.1016/0192-0561(95)00052-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cohen J. J. Individual variability and immunity. Brain Behav Immun. 1999 Jun;13(2):76–79. doi: 10.1006/brbi.1999.0561. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Desjardins C., Maruniak J. A., Bronson F. H. Social rank in house mice: differentiation revealed by ultraviolet visualization of urinary marking patterns. Science. 1973 Nov 20;182(4115):939–941. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4115.939. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Eggert F., Höller C., Luszyk D., Müller-Ruchholtz W., Ferstl R. MHC-associated and MHC-independent urinary chemosignals in mice. Physiol Behav. 1996 Jan;59(1):57–62. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(95)02029-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Humphries RE, Robertson DH, Beynon RJ, Hurst JL. Unravelling the chemical basis of competitive scent marking in house mice. Anim Behav. 1999 Dec;58(6):1177–1190. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hurst JL, Robertson DHL, Tolladay U, Beynon RJ. Proteins in urine scent marks of male house mice extend the longevity of olfactory signals. Anim Behav. 1998 May;55(5):1289–1297. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0650. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jennings M., Batchelor G. R., Brain P. F., Dick A., Elliott H., Francis R. J., Hubrecht R. C., Hurst J. L., Morton D. B., Peters A. G. Refining rodent husbandry: the mouse. Report of the Rodent Refinement Working Party. Lab Anim. 1998 Jul;32(3):233–259. doi: 10.1258/002367798780559301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Johnston RE, Sorokin ES, Ferkin MH. Female voles discriminate males' over-marks and prefer top-scent males. Anim Behav. 1997 Sep;54(3):679–690. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mugford R. A., Nowell N. W. Pheromones and their effect on aggression in mice. Nature. 1970 Jun 6;226(5249):967–968. doi: 10.1038/226967a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ninomiya K., Brown R. E. Removal of the preputial glands alters the individual odors of male MHC-congenic mice and the preferences of females for these odors. Physiol Behav. 1995 Jul;58(1):191–194. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(94)00374-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rich TJ, Hurst JL. The competing countermarks hypothesis: reliable assessment of competitive ability by potential mates. Anim Behav. 1999 Nov;58(5):1027–1037. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Schellinck H. M., West A. M., Brown R. E. Rats can discriminate between the urine odors of genetically identical mice maintained on different diets. Physiol Behav. 1992 May;51(5):1079–1082. doi: 10.1016/0031-9384(92)90096-k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Taylor D. M. Urethral plugs and urine retention in male mice. Lab Anim. 1985 Jul;19(3):189–191. doi: 10.1258/002367785780893566. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Van Oortmerssen G. A. Biological significance, genetics and evolutionary origin of variability in behaviour within and between inbred strains of mice (Mus musculus). A behaviour genetic study. Behaviour. 1971;38(1):1–92. doi: 10.1163/156853971x00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Yamaguchi M., Yamazaki K., Beauchamp G. K., Bard J., Thomas L., Boyse E. A. Distinctive urinary odors governed by the major histocompatibility locus of the mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Sep;78(9):5817–5820. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.9.5817. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES