Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 May 22;267(1447):1033–1040. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1107

Genetic evidence for the effect of a postglacial population expansion on the phylogeography of a North American songbird.

B Milá 1, D J Girman 1, M Kimura 1, T B Smith 1
PMCID: PMC1690639  PMID: 10874754

Abstract

Phylogeographical studies of Nearctic songbirds conducted to date have yielded unexpectedly low levels of genetic differentiation and weak phylogeographical structure in mitochondrial DNA lineages as compared with species studied in Neotropical areas. Factors leading to this pattern may include (i) gene flow, (ii) population expansions from bottlenecked populations, and (iii) selective sweeps. Here we provide evidence for the role played by Pleistocene postglacial population expansions on the phylogeography of MacGillivray's warbler (Oporornis tolmiei), a long-distance migratory bird. Samples from 12 breeding localities in the temperate USA were compared with those from two localities in north-eastern Mexico. The former showed evidence of a Late Pleistocene population expansion as indicated by low haplotype and nucleotide diversity, a star-like phylogeny of alleles, and a mismatch distribution indicating a sudden increase in effective population size. By contrast, the Mexican population showed high levels of genetic diversity and a mismatch distribution as expected for a population unaffected by sudden demographic change. Haplotypes from the two regions formed two distinct phylogroups which separated roughly one million years ago according to a conventional molecular clock for songbirds. This study provides support for the Pleistocene expansion hypothesis in MacGillivray's warbler and suggests that postglacial expansion of bottlenecked populations is responsible for the lack of variation and structure reported for most North American songbird species.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (331.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Avise J. C., Ball R. M., Arnold J. Current versus historical population sizes in vertebrate species with high gene flow: a comparison based on mitochondrial DNA lineages and inbreeding theory for neutral mutations. Mol Biol Evol. 1988 Jul;5(4):331–344. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Avise J. C., Nelson W. S. Molecular genetic relationships of the extinct dusky seaside sparrow. Science. 1989 Feb 3;243(4891):646–648. doi: 10.1126/science.243.4891.646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Avise J. C., Walker D. Pleistocene phylogeographic effects on avian populations and the speciation process. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Mar 22;265(1395):457–463. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Ball R. M., Freeman S., James F. C., Bermingham E., Avise J. C. Phylogeographic population structure of Red-winged Blackbirds assessed by mitochondrial DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Mar;85(5):1558–1562. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.5.1558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bermingham E., Rohwer S., Freeman S., Wood C. Vicariance biogeography in the Pleistocene and speciation in North American wood warblers: a test of Mengel's model. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Jul 15;89(14):6624–6628. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.14.6624. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Edwards S. V. Long-distance gene flow in a cooperative breeder detected in genealogies of mitochondrial DNA sequences. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Jun 22;252(1335):177–185. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Excoffier L., Smouse P. E., Quattro J. M. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics. 1992 Jun;131(2):479–491. doi: 10.1093/genetics/131.2.479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Fu Y. X. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking and background selection. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):915–925. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kimura M., Ota T. On the stochastic model for estimation of mutational distance between homologous proteins. J Mol Evol. 1972 Dec 29;2(1):87–90. doi: 10.1007/BF01653945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kocher T. D., Thomas W. K., Meyer A., Edwards S. V., Päbo S., Villablanca F. X., Wilson A. C. Dynamics of mitochondrial DNA evolution in animals: amplification and sequencing with conserved primers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1989 Aug;86(16):6196–6200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.86.16.6196. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Maruyama T., Birky C. W., Jr Effects of periodic selection on gene diversity in organelle genomes and other systems without recombination. Genetics. 1991 Feb;127(2):449–451. doi: 10.1093/genetics/127.2.449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  13. Quinn T. W. The genetic legacy of Mother Goose--phylogeographic patterns of lesser snow goose Chen caerulescens caerulescens maternal lineages. Mol Ecol. 1992 Aug;1(2):105–117. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1992.tb00162.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Rogers A. R., Harpending H. Population growth makes waves in the distribution of pairwise genetic differences. Mol Biol Evol. 1992 May;9(3):552–569. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040727. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Saiki R. K., Gelfand D. H., Stoffel S., Scharf S. J., Higuchi R., Horn G. T., Mullis K. B., Erlich H. A. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science. 1988 Jan 29;239(4839):487–491. doi: 10.1126/science.2448875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Slatkin M., Hudson R. R. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in stable and exponentially growing populations. Genetics. 1991 Oct;129(2):555–562. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.2.555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Stanley H. F., Casey S., Carnahan J. M., Goodman S., Harwood J., Wayne R. K. Worldwide patterns of mitochondrial DNA differentiation in the harbor seal (Phoca vitulina). Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Feb;13(2):368–382. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025596. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Tamura K., Nei M. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol. 1993 May;10(3):512–526. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Tarr C. L. Primers for amplification and determination of mitochondrial control-region sequences in oscine passerines. Mol Ecol. 1995 Aug;4(4):527–529. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1995.tb00251.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES