Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Jun 22;267(1449):1253–1258. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1135

Category differences in brain activation studies: where do they come from?

M L Gorno-Tempini 1, L Cipolotti 1, C J Price 1
PMCID: PMC1690667  PMID: 10902692

Abstract

Differences in the neural processing of six categories of pictorial stimuli (maps, body parts, objects, animals, famous faces and colours) were investigated using positron emission tomography. Stimuli were presented either with or without the written name of the picture, thereby creating a naming condition and a reading condition. As predicted, naming increased the demands on lexical processes. This was demonstrated by activation of the left temporal lobe in a posterior region associated with name retrieval in several previous studies. This lexical effect was common to all meaningful stimuli and no category-specific effects were observed for naming relative to reading. Nevertheless, category differences were found when naming and reading were considered together. Stimuli with greater visual complexity (animals, faces and maps) enhanced activation in the left extrastriate cortex. Furthermore, map recognition, which requires greater spatio-topographical processing, also activated the right occipito-parietal and parahippocampal cortices. These effects in the visuo-spatial regions emphasize inevitable differences in the perceptual properties of pictorial stimuli. In the semantic temporal regions, famous faces and objects enhanced activation in the left antero-lateral and postero-lateral cortices, respectively. In addition, we showed that the same posterior left temporal region is also activated by body parts. We conclude that category-specific brain activations depend more on differential processing at the perceptual and semantic levels rather than at the lexical retrieval level.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (296.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguirre G. K., Zarahn E., D'Esposito M. Neural components of topographical representation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):839–846. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cappa S. F., Perani D., Schnur T., Tettamanti M., Fazio F. The effects of semantic category and knowledge type on lexical-semantic access: a PET study. Neuroimage. 1998 Nov;8(4):350–359. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Caramazza A., Hillis A. E. Where do semantic errors come from? Cortex. 1990 Mar;26(1):95–122. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80077-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Caramazza A., Shelton J. R. Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain the animate-inanimate distinction. J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Jan;10(1):1–34. doi: 10.1162/089892998563752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Damasio H., Grabowski T. J., Tranel D., Hichwa R. D., Damasio A. R. A neural basis for lexical retrieval. Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):499–505. doi: 10.1038/380499a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. De Renzi E., Zambolin A., Crisi G. The pattern of neuropsychological impairment associated with left posterior cerebral artery infarcts. Brain. 1987 Oct;110(Pt 5):1099–1116. doi: 10.1093/brain/110.5.1099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ellis A. W., Young A. W., Critchley E. M. Loss of memory for people following temporal lobe damage. Brain. 1989 Dec;112(Pt 6):1469–1483. doi: 10.1093/brain/112.6.1469. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Farah M. J., Wallace M. A. Semantically-bounded anomia: implications for the neural implementation of naming. Neuropsychologia. 1992 Jul;30(7):609–621. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(92)90066-u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gorno-Tempini M. L., Price C. J., Josephs O., Vandenberghe R., Cappa S. F., Kapur N., Frackowiak R. S., Tempini M. L. The neural systems sustaining face and proper-name processing. Brain. 1998 Nov;121(Pt 11):2103–2118. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.11.2103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Haxby J. V., Horwitz B., Ungerleider L. G., Maisog J. M., Pietrini P., Grady C. L. The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations. J Neurosci. 1994 Nov;14(11 Pt 1):6336–6353. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-11-06336.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Humphreys G. W., Riddoch M. J., Price C. J. Top-down processes in object identification: evidence from experimental psychology, neuropsychology and functional anatomy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997 Aug 29;352(1358):1275–1282. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kapur N., Heath P., Meudell P., Kennedy P. Amnesia can facilitate memory performance: evidence from a patient with dissociated retrograde amnesia. Neuropsychologia. 1986;24(2):215–221. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(86)90054-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Martin A., Haxby J. V., Lalonde F. M., Wiggs C. L., Ungerleider L. G. Discrete cortical regions associated with knowledge of color and knowledge of action. Science. 1995 Oct 6;270(5233):102–105. doi: 10.1126/science.270.5233.102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Martin A., Wiggs C. L., Ungerleider L. G., Haxby J. V. Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge. Nature. 1996 Feb 15;379(6566):649–652. doi: 10.1038/379649a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Moore C. J., Price C. J. A functional neuroimaging study of the variables that generate category-specific object processing differences. Brain. 1999 May;122(Pt 5):943–962. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.5.943. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Moore C. J., Price C. J. Three distinct ventral occipitotemporal regions for reading and object naming. Neuroimage. 1999 Aug;10(2):181–192. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Mummery C. J., Patterson K., Hodges J. R., Price C. J. Functional neuroanatomy of the semantic system: divisible by what? J Cogn Neurosci. 1998 Nov;10(6):766–777. doi: 10.1162/089892998563059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Mummery C. J., Patterson K., Hodges J. R., Wise R. J. Generating 'tiger' as an animal name or a word beginning with T: differences in brain activation. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Aug 22;263(1373):989–995. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Perani D., Cappa S. F., Bettinardi V., Bressi S., Gorno-Tempini M., Matarrese M., Fazio F. Different neural systems for the recognition of animals and man-made tools. Neuroreport. 1995 Aug 21;6(12):1637–1641. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199508000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Perani D., Schnur T., Tettamanti M., Gorno-Tempini M., Cappa S. F., Fazio F. Word and picture matching: a PET study of semantic category effects. Neuropsychologia. 1999 Mar;37(3):293–306. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00073-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Price C. J., Friston K. J. Cognitive conjunction: a new approach to brain activation experiments. Neuroimage. 1997 May;5(4 Pt 1):261–270. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1997.0269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Semenza C., Zettin M. Evidence from aphasia for the role of proper names as pure referring expressions. Nature. 1989 Dec 7;342(6250):678–679. doi: 10.1038/342678a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Thompson-Schill S. L., Aguirre G. K., D'Esposito M., Farah M. J. A neural basis for category and modality specificity of semantic knowledge. Neuropsychologia. 1999 Jun;37(6):671–676. doi: 10.1016/s0028-3932(98)00126-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Warrington E. K., Shallice T. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain. 1984 Sep;107(Pt 3):829–854. doi: 10.1093/brain/107.3.829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES