Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Jul 7;267(1450):1321–1326. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1145

Heterosis increases the effective migration rate.

P K Ingvarsson 1, M C Whitlock 1
PMCID: PMC1690676  PMID: 10972127

Abstract

Individuals coming from the same subpopulation are more likely to share deleterious mutations at any given locus than hybrids formed between parents from different populations. Offspring of migrants therefore may experience heterosis and have higher fitness than resident individuals. This will, in turn, result in the immigrant alleles being present in higher frequencies than predicted from neutral expectations and thus a higher effective migration rate. In this paper we derive a formula to calculate the effective migration rate in the presence of heterosis. It is shown that the effect of heterosis on the migration rate can be substantial when fitness reduction within local populations is severe. The effect will be more pronounced in species with relatively short map lengths. Furthermore the heterosis effect will be highly variable throughout the genome, with the largest effect seen near selected genes and in regions of high gene density.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (196.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barton N., Bengtsson B. O. The barrier to genetic exchange between hybridising populations. Heredity (Edinb) 1986 Dec;57(Pt 3):357–376. doi: 10.1038/hdy.1986.135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Charlesworth B., Nordborg M., Charlesworth D. The effects of local selection, balanced polymorphism and background selection on equilibrium patterns of genetic diversity in subdivided populations. Genet Res. 1997 Oct;70(2):155–174. doi: 10.1017/s0016672397002954. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones C. S., Noble L. R., Jones J. S., Tegelström H., Triggs G. S., Berry R. J. Differential male genetic success determines gene flow in an experimentally manipulated mouse population. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Jun 22;260(1359):251–256. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0088. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. KIMURA M., MARUYAMA T., CROW J. F. THE MUTATION LOAD IN SMALL POPULATIONS. Genetics. 1963 Oct;48:1303–1312. doi: 10.1093/genetics/48.10.1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Petry D. The effect on neutral gene flow of selection at a linked locus. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Jun;23(3):300–313. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90020-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Whitlock M. C., McCauley D. E. Indirect measures of gene flow and migration: FST not equal to 1/(4Nm + 1). Heredity (Edinb) 1999 Feb;82(Pt 2):117–125. doi: 10.1038/sj.hdy.6884960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Wright S. The Distribution of Gene Frequencies in Populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1937 Jun;23(6):307–320. doi: 10.1073/pnas.23.6.307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES