Abstract
Alternative mating tactics can generate asymmetry in the sperm competition risk between males within species. Theory predicts that adaptations to sperm competition should arise in males facing the greater risk. This prediction is met in the dung beetle Onthophagus binodis where minor males which sneak copulations have a greater expenditure on the ejaculate. In its congener Onthophagus taurus there is a reduced asymmetry in sperm competition risk such that both tactics have equal ejaculate expenditure. We used the irradiated male technique to test whether adaptations to sperm competition in minor males result in higher paternity. We found that for both species, on average, each of two males gained equal numbers of fertilizations, confirming the assumption that sperm compete in a raffle. There were no differences in the sperm competition success of major and minor males in O. taurus as predicted from their equal expenditure on their ejaculate. Contrary to expectations, there were also no differences in fertilization success between the male tactics in O. binodis. Thus, in O. binodis minor males must expend more on their ejaculate in order to obtain the same fertilization gains as major males.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (207.5 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Harcourt A. H., Harvey P. H., Larson S. G., Short R. V. Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature. 1981 Sep 3;293(5827):55–57. doi: 10.1038/293055a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hosken D. J. Sperm competition in bats. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Mar 22;264(1380):385–392. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Linley J. R., Hinds M. J. Quantity of the male ejaculate influenced by female unreceptivity in the fly, Culicoides melleus. J Insect Physiol. 1975 Feb;21(2):281–285. doi: 10.1016/0022-1910(75)90023-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Parker G. A., Ball M. A., Stockley P., Gage M. J. Sperm competition games: a prospective analysis of risk assessment. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Dec 22;264(1389):1793–1802. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker G. A. Sperm competition games: sperm size and sperm number under adult control. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Sep 22;253(1338):245–254. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parker G. A. Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes. J Theor Biol. 1982 May 21;96(2):281–294. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(82)90225-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Snook RR. The risk of sperm competition and the evolution of sperm heteromorphism. Anim Behav. 1998 Dec;56(6):1497–1507. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0930. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]