Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Sep 22;267(1455):1909–1913. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1229

Differential effects of word length and visual contrast in the fusiform and lingual gyri during reading.

A Mechelli 1, G W Humphreys 1, K Mayall 1, A Olson 1, C J Price 1
PMCID: PMC1690747  PMID: 11052544

Abstract

Previous studies have shown differential responses in the fusiform and lingual gyri during reading and suggested that the former is engaged in processing local features of visual stimuli and the latter is engaged in global shape processing. We used positron emission tomography in order to investigate how these regions are modulated by two common variables in reading: word length (three, six and nine letters) and perceptive similarity to the background (high and low contrast). Increasing both word length and visual contrast had a positive monotonic effect on activation in the bilateral fusiform. However, in the lingual gyrus, activation increased with increasing word length but decreased with increasing contrast. On the basis of previous studies, we suggest that (i) increasing word length increases the demands on both local feature and global shape processing, but (ii) increasing visual contrast increases the demands on local feature processing while decreasing the demands on global shape processing.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (232.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brunswick N., McCrory E., Price C. J., Frith C. D., Frith U. Explicit and implicit processing of words and pseudowords by adult developmental dyslexics: A search for Wernicke's Wortschatz? Brain. 1999 Oct;122(Pt 10):1901–1917. doi: 10.1093/brain/122.10.1901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Fink G. R., Halligan P. W., Marshall J. C., Frith C. D., Frackowiak R. S., Dolan R. J. Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? Nature. 1996 Aug 15;382(6592):626–628. doi: 10.1038/382626a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Herdman C. M., Chernecki D., Norris D. Naming cAsE aLtErNaTeD words. Mem Cognit. 1999 Mar;27(2):254–266. doi: 10.3758/bf03211410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Howard D., Patterson K., Wise R., Brown W. D., Friston K., Weiller C., Frackowiak R. The cortical localization of the lexicons. Positron emission tomography evidence. Brain. 1992 Dec;115(Pt 6):1769–1782. doi: 10.1093/brain/115.6.1769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Indefrey P., Kleinschmidt A., Merboldt K. D., Krüger G., Brown C., Hagoort P., Frahm J. Equivalent responses to lexical and nonlexical visual stimuli in occipital cortex: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Neuroimage. 1997 Jan;5(1):78–81. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jernigan T. L., Ostergaard A. L., Law I., Svarer C., Gerlach C., Paulson O. B. Brain activation during word identification and word recognition. Neuroimage. 1998 Jul;8(1):93–105. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1998.0350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Livingstone M. S., Hubel D. H. Psychophysical evidence for separate channels for the perception of form, color, movement, and depth. J Neurosci. 1987 Nov;7(11):3416–3468. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.07-11-03416.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Moore C. J., Price C. J. Three distinct ventral occipitotemporal regions for reading and object naming. Neuroimage. 1999 Aug;10(2):181–192. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1999.0450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Petersen S. E., Fox P. T., Posner M. I., Mintun M., Raichle M. E. Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature. 1988 Feb 18;331(6157):585–589. doi: 10.1038/331585a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Petersen S. E., Fox P. T., Snyder A. Z., Raichle M. E. Activation of extrastriate and frontal cortical areas by visual words and word-like stimuli. Science. 1990 Aug 31;249(4972):1041–1044. doi: 10.1126/science.2396097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Price C. J., Friston K. J. The temporal dynamics of reading: a PET study. Proc Biol Sci. 1997 Dec 22;264(1389):1785–1791. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Price C. J., Moore C. J., Frackowiak R. S. The effect of varying stimulus rate and duration on brain activity during reading. Neuroimage. 1996 Feb;3(1):40–52. doi: 10.1006/nimg.1996.0005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Price C. J., Wise R. J., Frackowiak R. S. Demonstrating the implicit processing of visually presented words and pseudowords. Cereb Cortex. 1996 Jan-Feb;6(1):62–70. doi: 10.1093/cercor/6.1.62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Price C. J., Wise R. J., Watson J. D., Patterson K., Howard D., Frackowiak R. S. Brain activity during reading. The effects of exposure duration and task. Brain. 1994 Dec;117(Pt 6):1255–1269. doi: 10.1093/brain/117.6.1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES