Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Sep 22;267(1455):1857–1861. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1221

Induced indirect defence in a lycaenid-ant association: the regulation of a resource in a mutualism.

A A Agrawal 1, J A Fordyce 1
PMCID: PMC1690751  PMID: 11052536

Abstract

Indirect defences involve the protection of a host organism by a mutualistic partner. Threat of predation to the host organism may induce the production of rewards and/or signals that attract the mutualistic partner. In laboratory and field experiments we show that threatened lycaenid butterfly larvae (Plebejus acmon) produce more nectar rewards from their gland and were tended by protective ants twice as much as controls. Ant attendance did not affect the leaf consumption or feeding behaviour of larvae in the absence of predators. Inducible nectar production and indirect defence in this system may be a mechanism by which larvae provide rewards for services when they are needed the most. Such a system may stabilize the mutualistic association between lycaenid larvae and ants by preventing exploitation by either partner.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (283.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Agrawal AA. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance . Science. 1998 Feb 20;279(5354):1201–1202. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5354.1201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Axelrod R., Hamilton W. D. The evolution of cooperation. Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1390–1396. doi: 10.1126/science.7466396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bull J. J., Rice W. R. Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of co-operation. J Theor Biol. 1991 Mar 7;149(1):63–74. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80072-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Devries P. J. Enhancement of symbioses between butterfly caterpillars and ants by vibrational communication. Science. 1990 Jun 1;248(4959):1104–1106. doi: 10.1126/science.248.4959.1104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Doebeli M., Knowlton N. The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 21;95(15):8676–8680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1997.0167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  8. Roberts G., Sherratt T. N. Development of cooperative relationships through increasing investment. Nature. 1998 Jul 9;394(6689):175–179. doi: 10.1038/28160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES