Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Oct 7;267(1456):1967–1972. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1237

Temporally explicit habitat ecology and the coexistence of species.

M P Johnson 1
PMCID: PMC1690771  PMID: 11075709

Abstract

Habitats may have dynamics that exist independently of the population densities of species occupying the habitat. For example, ephemeral habitat patches may disappear regardless of whether a particular species is present or not. Such habitat dynamics are frequently modelled by ignoring age-related variation in patch turnover rates. This can be thought of as a temporally implicit approach. An alternative, temporally explicit approach involves using age-structured models in order to describe variations in habitat dynamics. Simple models of coexistence between competing species show that temporally implicit models may be misleading where there is age-related variation in patch dynamics. Changing the shape of the patch survivorship function but not the average patch survivorship can result in mutual extinction, monocultures or coexistence of an inferior and a superior competitor. An explicit treatment of habitat demography may therefore offer improved predictive models and alternative landscape management strategies.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (231.9 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Batzli GO. Can seasonal changes in density dependence drive population cycles? Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Apr;14(4):129–131. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01581-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Brachet S, Olivieri I, I, Godelle B, Klein E, Frascaria-Lacoste N, Gouyon PH. Dispersal and metapopulation viability in a heterogeneous landscape . J Theor Biol. 1999 Jun 21;198(4):479–495. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Comins H. N., Hamilton W. D., May R. M. Evolutionarily stable dispersal strategies. J Theor Biol. 1980 Jan 21;82(2):205–230. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(80)90099-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Gyllenberg M, Hanski I., I Habitat Deterioration, Habitat Destruction, and Metapopulation Persistence in a Heterogenous Landscape. Theor Popul Biol. 1997 Dec;52(3):198–215. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1997.1333. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Levin S. A., Paine R. T. Disturbance, patch formation, and community structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1974 Jul;71(7):2744–2747. doi: 10.1073/pnas.71.7.2744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Levins R., Culver D. Regional Coexistence of Species and Competition between Rare Species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1971 Jun;68(6):1246–1248. doi: 10.1073/pnas.68.6.1246. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  8. Stearns S. C. Life-history tactics: a review of the ideas. Q Rev Biol. 1976 Mar;51(1):3–47. doi: 10.1086/409052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES