Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Oct 22;267(1457):2099–2104. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1255

Variation in the volume of zebra finch song control nuclei is heritable: developmental and evolutionary implications.

D C Airey 1, H Castillo-Juarez 1, G Casella 1, E J Pollak 1, T J DeVoogd 1
PMCID: PMC1690780  PMID: 11416915

Abstract

In many songbird species, females prefer males that sing a larger repertoire of syllables. Males with more elaborate songs have a larger high vocal centre (HVC) nucleus, the highest structure in the song production pathway. HVC size is thus a potential target of sexual selection. Here we provide evidence that the size of the HVC and other song production nuclei are heritable across individual males within a species. In contrast, we find that heritabilities of other nuclei in a song-learning pathway are lower, suggesting that variation in the sizes of these structures is more closely tied to developmental and environmental differences between individuals. We find that evolvability, a statistical measure that predicts response to selection, is higher for the HVC and its target for song production, the robustus archistriatalis (RA), than for all other brain volumes measured. This suggests that selection based on the functions of these two structures would result in rapid major shifts in their anatomy. We also show that the size of each song control nucleus is significantly correlated with the song related nuclei to which it is monosynaptically connected. Finally, we find that the volume of the telencephalon is larger in males than in females. These findings begin to join theoretical analyses of the role of female choice in the evolution of bird song to neurobiological mechanisms by which the evolutionary changes in behaviour are expressed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (205.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Airey D. C., Buchanan K. L., Szekely T., Catchpole C. K., DeVoogd T. J. Song, sexual selection, and a song control nucleus (HVc) in the brains of European sedge warblers. J Neurobiol. 2000 Jul;44(1):1–6. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Airey D. C., DeVoogd T. J. Greater song complexity is associated with augmented song system anatomy in zebra finches. Neuroreport. 2000 Jul 14;11(10):2339–2344. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200007140-00054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ball G. F., Balthazart J. How should brain nuclei be delineated? They don't need to be! Trends Neurosci. 1997 Aug;20(8):344–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bottjer S. W., Johnson F. How should brain nuclei be delineated? They don't need to be! Trends Neurosci. 1997 Aug;20(8):344–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bottjer S. W., Miesner E. A., Arnold A. P. Forebrain lesions disrupt development but not maintenance of song in passerine birds. Science. 1984 May 25;224(4651):901–903. doi: 10.1126/science.6719123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brenowitz E. A., Lent K., Kroodsma D. E. Brain space for learned song in birds develops independently of song learning. J Neurosci. 1995 Sep;15(9):6281–6286. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-09-06281.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Brenowitz E. A., Smith G. T. How should brain nuclei be delineated? They don't need to be! Trends Neurosci. 1997 Aug;20(8):345–346. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Burek M. J., Nordeen K. W., Nordeen E. J. Neuron loss and addition in developing zebra finch song nuclei are independent of auditory experience during song learning. J Neurobiol. 1991 Apr;22(3):215–223. doi: 10.1002/neu.480220302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Canady R. A., Kroodsma D. E., Nottebohm F. Population differences in complexity of a learned skill are correlated with the brain space involved. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Oct;81(19):6232–6234. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.19.6232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Devoogd T. J., Krebs J. R., Healy S. D., Purvis A. Relations between song repertoire size and the volume of brain nuclei related to song: comparative evolutionary analyses amongst oscine birds. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Nov 22;254(1340):75–82. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Gahr M. How should brain nuclei be delineated? Consequences for developmental mechanisms and for correlations of area size, neuron numbers and functions of brain nuclei. Trends Neurosci. 1997 Feb;20(2):58–62. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)10076-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gahr M., Metzdorf R. The sexually dimorphic expression of androgen receptors in the song nucleus hyperstriatalis ventrale pars caudale of the zebra finch develops independently of gonadal steroids. J Neurosci. 1999 Apr 1;19(7):2628–2636. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.19-07-02628.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Houle D. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics. 1992 Jan;130(1):195–204. doi: 10.1093/genetics/130.1.195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kirn J. R., DeVoogd T. J. Genesis and death of vocal control neurons during sexual differentiation in the zebra finch. J Neurosci. 1989 Sep;9(9):3176–3187. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.09-09-03176.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Nixdorf-Bergweiler B. E. Divergent and parallel development in volume sizes of telencephalic song nuclei in male and female zebra finches. J Comp Neurol. 1996 Nov 18;375(3):445–456. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19961118)375:3<445::AID-CNE7>3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Nottebohm F., Kasparian S., Pandazis C. Brain space for a learned task. Brain Res. 1981 May 25;213(1):99–109. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(81)91250-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Scharff C., Nottebohm F. A comparative study of the behavioral deficits following lesions of various parts of the zebra finch song system: implications for vocal learning. J Neurosci. 1991 Sep;11(9):2896–2913. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.11-09-02896.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ward B. C., Nordeen E. J., Nordeen K. W. Individual variation in neuron number predicts differences in the propensity for avian vocal imitation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):1277–1282. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES