Abstract
Where both sexes invest substantially in offspring, both females and males should discriminate between potential partners when choosing mates. The degree of choosiness should relate to the costs of choice and to the potential benefits to be gained. We measured offspring quality from experimentally staged matings with preferred and non-preferred partners in a sex-role-reversed pipefish, Syngnathus typhle L. Here, a substantial male investment in offspring results in a lower potential reproductive rate in males than in females, and access to males limits female reproductive success rather than vice versa. Thus, males are choosier than females and females compete more intensely over mates than do males. Broods from preferred matings were superior at escaping predation, when either males or females were allowed to choose a partner. However, only 'choosing' females benefited in terms of faster-growing offspring. Our results have important implications for mate-choice research: here we show that even the more competitive and less choosy sex may contribute significantly to sexual selection through mate choice.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (174.8 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Amundsen T. Why are female birds ornamented? Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Apr;15(4):149–155. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(99)01800-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drickamer LC, Gowaty PA, Holmes CM. Free female mate choice in house mice affects reproductive success and offspring viability and performance. Anim Behav. 2000 Feb;59(2):371–378. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1316. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jones IL, Hunter FM. Experimental evidence for mutual inter- and intrasexual selection favouring a crested auklet ornament. Anim Behav. 1999 Mar;57(3):521–528. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]