Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Nov 22;267(1459):2287–2293. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1281

Nest predation increases with parental activity: separating nest site and parental activity effects.

T E Martin 1, J Scott 1, C Menge 1
PMCID: PMC1690815  PMID: 11413645

Abstract

Alexander Skutch hypothesized that increased parental activity can increase the risk of nest predation. We tested this hypothesis using ten open-nesting bird species in Arizona, USA. Parental activity was greater during the nestling than incubation stage because parents visited the nest frequently to feed their young during the nestling stage. However, nest predation did not generally increase with parental activity between nesting stages across the ten study species. Previous investigators have found similar results. We tested whether nest site effects might yield higher predation during incubation because the most obvious sites are depredated most rapidly. We conducted experiments using nest sites from the previous year to remove parental activity. Our results showed that nest sites have highly repeatable effects on nest predation risk; poor nest sites incurred rapid predation and caused predation rates to be greater during the incubation than nestling stage. This pattern also was exhibited in a bird species with similar (i.e. controlled) parental activity between nesting stages. Once nest site effects are taken into account, nest predation shows a strong proximate increase with parental activity during the nestling stage within and across species. Parental activity and nest sites exert antagonistic influences on current estimates of nest predation between nesting stages and both must be considered in order to understand current patterns of nest predation, which is an important source of natural selection.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (135.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Conway C. J., Martin T. E. Evolution of passerine incubation behavior: influence of food, temperature, and nest predation. Evolution. 2000 Apr;54(2):670–685. doi: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00068.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ghalambor CK, Martin TE. Parental investment strategies in two species of nuthatch vary with stage-specific predation risk and reproductive effort. Anim Behav. 2000 Aug;60(2):263–267. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Kilner R, Davies NB. Nestling mouth colour: ecological correlates of a begging signal. Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):705–712. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Martin T. E., Martin P. R., Olson C. R., Heidinger B. J., Fontaine J. J. Parental care and clutch sizes in North and South American birds. Science. 2000 Feb 25;287(5457):1482–1485. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5457.1482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES