Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Nov 22;267(1459):2317–2321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1285

Development of infant baboons' responses to graded bark variants.

J Fischer 1, D L Cheney 1, R M Seyfarth 1
PMCID: PMC1690819  PMID: 11413649

Abstract

We studied the development of infant baboons' (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) responses to conspecific 'barks' in a free-ranging population in the Okavango Delta, Botswana. These barks grade from tonal, harmonically rich calls into calls with a more noisy, harsh structure. Typically, tonal variants are given when the signaller is at risk of losing contact with the group or a particular individual ('contact barks'), whereas harsh variants are given in response to predators ('alarm barks'). We conducted focal observations and playback experiments in which we presented variants of barks recorded from resident adult females. By six months of age, infants reliably discriminated between typical alarm and contact barks and they responded more strongly to intermediate alarm calls than to typical contact barks. Infants of six months and older also recognized their mothers by voice. The ability to discriminate between different call variants developed with increasing age. At two and a half months of age, infants failed to respond at all, whereas at four months they responded irrespective of the call type that was presented. At six months, infants showed adult-like responses by responding strongly to alarm barks but ignoring contact barks. We concluded that infants gradually learn to attach the appropriate meaning to alarm and contact barks.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (122.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Mundry R. Testing related samples with missing values: a permutation approach. Anim Behav. 1999 Nov;58(5):1143–1153. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Owren M. J., Dieter J. A., Seyfarth R. M., Cheney D. L. Vocalizations of rhesus (Macaca mulatta) and Japanese (M. fuscata) macaques cross-fostered between species show evidence of only limited modification. Dev Psychobiol. 1993 Nov;26(7):389–406. doi: 10.1002/dev.420260703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Rendall D., Cheney D. L., Seyfarth R. M. Proximate factors mediating "contact" calls in adult female baboons (Papio cynocephalus ursinus) and their infants. J Comp Psychol. 2000 Mar;114(1):36–46. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.114.1.36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Rendall D, Seyfarth RM, Cheney DL, Owren MJ. The meaning and function of grunt variants in baboons. Anim Behav. 1999 Mar;57(3):583–592. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Seyfarth R. M., Cheney D. L., Marler P. Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence of predator classification and semantic communication. Science. 1980 Nov 14;210(4471):801–803. doi: 10.1126/science.7433999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES