Abstract
Fitness costs of signalling are essential in order for reliable sexual signalling to prevail when the interests of the sexes conflict. This means that signalling can be subjected to a life history trade-off between present and future signalling effort. Here, I show that three-spined stickleback males (Gasterosteus aculeatus), who have a single breeding season during which they breed repeatedly, change their red nuptial coloration over the season depending on their body size at the start of breeding. Large males that completed several breeding cycles increased their red coloration over the season, whereas small males, who completed only a few cycles, did not. The increase in coloration was accompanied by an increase in parental success when males were energy constrained, but not when they had access to an unlimited food supply. Red coloration was thus an honest signal of male parental ability despite changes in signal expression when both signalling and parental care were costly and the investments in them changed simultaneously over the reproductive lifetime. However, the honesty of the signal varied over a lifetime. At the penultimate cycle, bright males cannibalized some of their eggs, probably to increase survival to the last cycle, whereas males cared for their offspring independent of coloration at the ultimate cycle.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (210.3 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Candolin U. Increased signalling effort when survival prospects decrease: male-male competition ensures honesty. Anim Behav. 2000 Oct;60(4):417–422. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Candolin U. The relationship between signal quality and physical condition: is sexual signalling honest in the three-spined stickleback? Anim Behav. 1999 Dec;58(6):1261–1267. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FitzGerald G. J., Guderley H., Picard P. Hidden reproductive costs in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus). Exp Biol. 1989;48(5):295–300. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Getty T. Handicap signalling: when fecundity and viability do not add up. Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):127–130. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0744. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Polak M., Starmer W. T. Parasite-induced risk of mortality elevates reproductive effort in male Drosophila. Proc Biol Sci. 1998 Nov 22;265(1411):2197–2201. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0559. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zahavi A. Mate selection-a selection for a handicap. J Theor Biol. 1975 Sep;53(1):205–214. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(75)90111-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]