Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Dec 7;267(1460):2367–2373. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1293

Sympatric speciation: compliance with phenotype diversification from a single genotype.

K Kaneko 1, T Yomo 1
PMCID: PMC1690829  PMID: 11133025

Abstract

A novel mechanism for sympatric speciation that takes into account complex bioprocesses within each individual organism is proposed. According to dynamical systems theory, organisms with identical genotypes can possess differentiated physiological states and may coexist 'symbiotically' through appropriate mutual interaction. With mutations, the phenotypically differentiated organisms gradually come to possess distinct genotypes while maintaining their symbiotic relationship. This symbiotic speciation is robust against sexual recombination, because offspring of mixed parentage with intermediate genotypes are less fit than their parents. This leads to sterility of the hybrid. Accordingly, a basis for mating preference also arises.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (333.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Dieckmann U., Doebeli M. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature. 1999 Jul 22;400(6742):354–357. doi: 10.1038/22521. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Furusawa C., Kaneko K. Emergence of rules in cell society: differentiation, hierarchy, and stability. Bull Math Biol. 1998 Jul;60(4):659–687. doi: 10.1006/bulm.1997.0034. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Holmes L. B. Penetrance and expressivity of limb malformations. Birth Defects Orig Artic Ser. 1979;15(5B):321–327. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kaneko K., Yomo T. Isologous diversification for robust development of cell society. J Theor Biol. 1999 Aug 7;199(3):243–256. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kaneko K., Yomo T. Isologous diversification: a theory of cell differentiation. Bull Math Biol. 1997 Jan;59(1):139–196. doi: 10.1007/BF02459474. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kondrashov A. S., Kondrashov F. A. Interactions among quantitative traits in the course of sympatric speciation. Nature. 1999 Jul 22;400(6742):351–354. doi: 10.1038/22514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1981 Jun;78(6):3721–3725. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.6.3721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Novick A., Weiner M. ENZYME INDUCTION AS AN ALL-OR-NONE PHENOMENON. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1957 Jul 15;43(7):553–566. doi: 10.1073/pnas.43.7.553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Opitz J. M. Some comments on penetrance and related subjects. Am J Med Genet. 1981;8(3):265–274. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320080303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Titman D. Ecological competition between algae: experimental confirmation of resource-based competition theory. Science. 1976 Apr 30;192(4238):463–465. doi: 10.1126/science.192.4238.463. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES