Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Dec 7;267(1460):2431–2437. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1302

Genetic monogamy and biparental care in an externally fertilizing fish, the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides).

J A DeWoody 1, D E Fletcher 1, S D Wilkins 1, W S Nelson 1, J C Avise 1
PMCID: PMC1690830  PMID: 11133034

Abstract

Breeding, male North American sunfish (Centrarchidae), are often brightly coloured and promiscuous. However, the largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides) is sexually monomorphic in appearance and socially monogamous. Unlike some other nest-tending centrarchids in the genus Lepomis, largemouth bass have also been reported to provide biparental care to eggs and fry. Here we use microsatellite markers in order to test whether social monogamy predicts genetic monogamy in the largemouth bass. Offspring were collected from 26 nests each usually guarded by a pair of adults, many of which were also captured. Twenty-three of these progeny cohorts (88%) proved to be composed almost exclusively of full-sibs and were thus the product of monogamous matings. Cuckoldry by males was rare. The genetic data also revealed that some nests contain juveniles that were not the progeny of the guardian female, a finding that can be thought of as low-level 'female cuckoldry'. Overall, however, the data provide what may be the first genetic documentation of near-monogamy and biparental care in a vertebrate with external fertilization.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (188.1 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Brotherton P. N., Rhodes A. Monogamy without biparental care in a dwarf antelope. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Jan 22;263(1366):23–29. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Choudhary M., Strassmann J. E., Solís C. R., Queller D. C. Microsatellite variation in a social insect. Biochem Genet. 1993 Feb;31(1-2):87–96. doi: 10.1007/BF02399822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Coltman D. W., Bancroft D. R., Robertson A., Smith J. A., Clutton-Brock T. H., Pemberton J. M. Male reproductive success in a promiscuous mammal: behavioural estimates compared with genetic paternity. Mol Ecol. 1999 Jul;8(7):1199–1209. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1999.00683.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Jones A. G., Kvarnemo C., Moore G. I., Simmons L. W., Avise J. C. Microsatellite evidence for monogamy and sex-biased recombination in the Western Australian seahorse Hippocampus angustus. Mol Ecol. 1998 Nov;7(11):1497–1505. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00481.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES