Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2000 Dec 22;267(1461):2559–2565. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1321

Attentional diversion during adaptation affects the velocity as well as the duration of motion after-effects.

M S Georgiades 1, J P Harris 1
PMCID: PMC1690849  PMID: 11197135

Abstract

The effects of diverting attention on early motion processing in human vision were studied with a selective adaptation technique. The velocity of motion after-effects (MAEs) produced on a stationary test grating after prolonged exposure to drifting luminance-modulated gratings was measured by matching MAE velocity with that of another physically moving grating. Initial MAE velocities decreased and their rate of decay increased with the distance of the adapting and test gratings from the fixation point. When attention was diverted from the adapting grating, by having subjects process the intermittently changing digit which formed the fixation point, initial MAE velocities were reduced and rate of decay increased, with the largest effect of diversion being found for gratings near the fixation point. The effects of varying attention mimic those of varying adapting duration, rather than adapting contrast or velocity, and appear to reflect a genuine change in motion-processing mechanisms.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (343.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beverley K. I., Regan D. Separable aftereffects of changing-size and motion-in-depth: different neural mechanisms? Vision Res. 1979;19(6):727–732. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(79)90251-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Blaser E., Sperling G., Lu Z. L. Measuring the amplification of attention. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Sep 28;96(20):11681–11686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Cavanagh P. Attention-based motion perception. Science. 1992 Sep 11;257(5076):1563–1565. doi: 10.1126/science.1523411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chaudhuri A. Modulation of the motion aftereffect by selective attention. Nature. 1990 Mar 1;344(6261):60–62. doi: 10.1038/344060a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cheng K., Hasegawa T., Saleem K. S., Tanaka K. Comparison of neuronal selectivity for stimulus speed, length, and contrast in the prestriate visual cortical areas V4 and MT of the macaque monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1994 Jun;71(6):2269–2280. doi: 10.1152/jn.1994.71.6.2269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Crick F. Function of the thalamic reticular complex: the searchlight hypothesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(14):4586–4590. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.14.4586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dodwell P. C., Humphrey G. K. A functional theory of the McCollough effect. Psychol Rev. 1990 Jan;97(1):78–89. doi: 10.1037/0033-295x.97.1.78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Egly R., Homa D. Sensitization of the visual field. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1984 Dec;10(6):778–793. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.10.6.778. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Greenlee M. W., Georgeson M. A., Magnussen S., Harris J. P. The time course of adaptation to spatial contrast. Vision Res. 1991;31(2):223–236. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(91)90113-j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hammond P., Mouat G. S., Smith A. T. Motion after-effects in cat striate cortex elicited by moving gratings. Exp Brain Res. 1985;60(2):411–416. doi: 10.1007/BF00235938. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Hammond P., Mouat G. S., Smith A. T. Motion after-effects in cat striate cortex elicited by moving texture. Vision Res. 1986;26(7):1055–1060. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(86)90039-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hershenson M. Duration, time constant, and decay of the linear motion aftereffect as a function of inspection duration. Percept Psychophys. 1989 Mar;45(3):251–257. doi: 10.3758/bf03210704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lankheet M. J., Verstraten F. A. Attentional modulation of adaptation to two-component transparent motion. Vision Res. 1995 May;35(10):1401–1412. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(95)98720-t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lu Z. L., Liu C. Q., Dosher B. A. Attention mechanisms for multi-location first- and second-order motion perception. Vision Res. 2000;40(2):173–186. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(99)00172-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mangun G. R., Hillyard S. A. Spatial gradients of visual attention: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol. 1988 Nov;70(5):417–428. doi: 10.1016/0013-4694(88)90019-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Posner M. I., Snyder C. R., Davidson B. J. Attention and the detection of signals. J Exp Psychol. 1980 Jun;109(2):160–174. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Rees G., Frith C. D., Lavie N. Modulating irrelevant motion perception by varying attentional load in an unrelated task. Science. 1997 Nov 28;278(5343):1616–1619. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5343.1616. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Shulman G. L. Attentional effects of adaptation of rotary motion in the plane. Perception. 1993;22(8):947–961. doi: 10.1068/p220947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Shulman G. L., Sheehy J. B., Wilson J. Gradients of spatial attention. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1986 Feb;61(2):167–181. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(86)90029-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Smith A. T., Hammond P. The pattern specificity of velocity aftereffects. Exp Brain Res. 1985;60(1):71–78. doi: 10.1007/BF00237020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith A. T., Singh K. D., Greenlee M. W. Attentional suppression of activity in the human visual cortex. Neuroreport. 2000 Feb 7;11(2):271–277. doi: 10.1097/00001756-200002070-00010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Smith A. T. Velocity coding: evidence from perceived velocity shifts. Vision Res. 1985;25(12):1969–1976. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(85)90021-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. TAYLOR M. M. Tracking the decay of the after-effect of seen rotary movement. Percept Mot Skills. 1963 Feb;16:119–129. doi: 10.2466/pms.1963.16.1.119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. TAYLOR M. M. Tracking the neutralization of seen rotary movement. Percept Mot Skills. 1963 Apr;16:513–519. doi: 10.2466/pms.1963.16.2.513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Tootell R. B., Reppas J. B., Dale A. M., Look R. B., Sereno M. I., Malach R., Brady T. J., Rosen B. R. Visual motion aftereffect in human cortical area MT revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Nature. 1995 May 11;375(6527):139–141. doi: 10.1038/375139a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Tootell R. B., Reppas J. B., Kwong K. K., Malach R., Born R. T., Brady T. J., Rosen B. R., Belliveau J. W. Functional analysis of human MT and related visual cortical areas using magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosci. 1995 Apr;15(4):3215–3230. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.15-04-03215.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Treue S., Maunsell J. H. Attentional modulation of visual motion processing in cortical areas MT and MST. Nature. 1996 Aug 8;382(6591):539–541. doi: 10.1038/382539a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Watanabe T., Harner A. M., Miyauchi S., Sasaki Y., Nielsen M., Palomo D., Mukai I. Task-dependent influences of attention on the activation of human primary visual cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Sep 15;95(19):11489–11492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.19.11489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. von Grünau M. W., Bertone A., Pakneshan P. Attentional selection of motion states. Spat Vis. 1998;11(4):329–347. doi: 10.1163/156856898x00068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES