Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Jan 22;269(1487):179–186. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1884

High reproductive skew in tropical hover wasps.

Seirian Sumner 1, Maurizio Casiraghi 1, William Foster 1, Jeremy Field 1
PMCID: PMC1690882  PMID: 11798434

Abstract

A plethora of recent models examines how genetic and environmental factors might influence partitioning of reproduction ('skew') in animal societies, but empirical data are sparse. We used three microsatellite loci to estimate skew on 13 nests of the Malaysian hover wasp, Liostenogaster flavolineata. Groups are small in L. flavolineata (1-10 females) and all females are capable of mating and laying eggs. Despite considerable variation between nests in parameters expected to influence skew, skew was uniformly high. On 11 of the 13 nests, all female eggs had been laid by a single dominant female. A second female had laid one to two out of 5-10 eggs respectively on the two remaining nests. A likelihood analysis suggested that on average, 90% of the male eggs had also been laid by the dominant. The slightly lower skew among male eggs might reflect the lower average relatedness of subordinates to male versus female offspring of the dominant. We suggest that high skew in L. flavolineata may result from strong ecological constraints and a relatively high probability that a subordinate will eventually inherit the dominant, egg-laying position.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (133.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Field J., Shreeves G., Sumner S., Casiraghi M. Insurance-based advantage to helpers in a tropical hover wasp. Nature. 2000 Apr 20;404(6780):869–871. doi: 10.1038/35009097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Field J, Foster W. Helping behaviour in facultatively eusocial hover wasps: an experimental test of the subfertility hypothesis. Anim Behav. 1999 Mar;57(3):633–636. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.0995. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Heinze J, Keller L. Alternative reproductive strategies: a queen perspective in ants. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Dec 1;15(12):508–512. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01995-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kokko H., Johnstone R. A., Clutton-Brock T. H. The evolution of cooperative breeding through group augmentation. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jan 22;268(1463):187–196. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kokko H, Mackenzie A, Reynolds JD, Lindström J, Sutherland WJ. Measures of Inequality Are Not Equal. Am Nat. 1999 Sep;154(3):358–382. doi: 10.1086/303235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0386. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  7. Peters J. M., Queller D. C., Strassmann J. E., Solís C. R. Maternity assignment and queen replacement in a social wasp. Proc Biol Sci. 1995 Apr 22;260(1357):7–12. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1995.0052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Reeve H. K., Keller L. Tests of reproductive-skew models in social insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2001;46:347–385. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.46.1.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Reeve H. K., Starks P. T., Peters J. M., Nonacs P. Genetic support for the evolutionary theory of reproductive transactions in social wasps. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jan 7;267(1438):75–79. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.0969. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES