Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Feb 22;269(1489):375–381. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1887

The evolution of cuckoo parasitism: a comparative analysis.

O Krüger 1, N B Davies 1
PMCID: PMC1690908  PMID: 11886625

Abstract

Cuckoos (family Cuculidae) show the highest diversity of breeding strategies within one bird family (parental care, facultative and obligate brood parasites). We used independent contrasts from two phylogenies to examine how this variation was related to 13 ecological and life-history variables. The ancestral state was probably tropical, resident, forest cuckoos with parental care. The evolution of brood parasitism was correlated with a shift to more open habitats, a change in diet, increases in species breeding-range size and migration, and a decrease in egg size. Once parasitism had evolved, more elaborate parasitic strategies (more harmful to host fitness) were correlated with decreased egg size, a change in diet, increased breeding-range size and migration, a shortened breeding season and a decrease in local abundance. Establishing the most probable evolutionary pathways, using the method of Pagel, shows that changes in ecological variables (such as migration, range size and diet type) preceded the evolution of brood parasitism, which is likely to be a later adaptation to reduce the cost of reproduction. By contrast, brood parasitism evolved before changes in egg size occurred, indicating that egg size is an adaptive trait in host--parasite coevolution. Our results suggest that the evolution of cuckoo brood parasitism reflects selection from both ecological pressures and host defences.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (224.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Cézilly F, Dubois F, Pagel M. Is mate fidelity related to site fidelity? A comparative analysis in Ciconiiforms. Anim Behav. 2000 Jun;59(6):1143–1152. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harvey P. H., Rambaut A. Comparative analyses for adaptive radiations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Nov 29;355(1403):1599–1605. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Marchetti K. Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim Behav. 2000 Apr;59(4):877–883. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1388. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Pagel M. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature. 1999 Oct 28;401(6756):877–884. doi: 10.1038/44766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Price T. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997 Apr 29;352(1352):519–529. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Purvis A., Rambaut A. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Comput Appl Biosci. 1995 Jun;11(3):247–251. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/11.3.247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
11886625s01.pdf (969.5KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES