Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Mar 7;269(1490):513–516. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1920

High temporal frequency synchrony is insufficient for perceptual grouping.

Michael Morgan 1, Eric Castet 1
PMCID: PMC1690915  PMID: 11886644

Abstract

We used textures of randomly moving grating patches to assess the role of fine-grain temporal synchrony in texture segregation. In the target area, patches reversed direction simultaneously. In the surround, patches changed direction at random times. Thus, phase changes in the target area were precisely synchronous, whereas those in the surround were not. In agreement with work carried out by Lee and Blake, we found that the target area was frequently visible, and that observers could discriminate its shape (horizontal versus vertical) at frame rates of 100 Hz in brief exposures (200 ms). Further experiments suggested that the length of unidirectional motion sequences in the target area, rather than synchrony, determined its visibility. To eliminate completely contrast and motion cues, we made all the background elements identical to the target elements, but with a random starting phase. Despite the presence of synchrony in the target area but not the background, the target was generally very hard to see. Targets that remained visible contained low temporal frequency modulations of direction. We conclude that the human observer can detect synchrony, but only at modest temporal frequencies once motion and contrast artefacts have been eliminated.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (246.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Anderson J. F., Andreadis T. G., Vossbrinck C. R., Tirrell S., Wakem E. M., French R. A., Garmendia A. E., Van Kruiningen H. J. Isolation of West Nile virus from mosquitoes, crows, and a Cooper's hawk in Connecticut. Science. 1999 Dec 17;286(5448):2331–2333. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5448.2331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Castelo-Branco M., Goebel R., Neuenschwander S., Singer W. Neural synchrony correlates with surface segregation rules. Nature. 2000 Jun 8;405(6787):685–689. doi: 10.1038/35015079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Creelman C. D., Macmillan N. A. Auditory phase and frequency discrimination: a comparison of nine procedures. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1979 Feb;5(1):146–156. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.5.1.146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Dakin S. C., Watt R. J. The computation of orientation statistics from visual texture. Vision Res. 1997 Nov;37(22):3181–3192. doi: 10.1016/s0042-6989(97)00133-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Fahle M. Figure-ground discrimination from temporal information. Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Dec 22;254(1341):199–203. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1993.0146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Farid H., Adelson E. H. Synchrony does not promote grouping in temporally structured displays. Nat Neurosci. 2001 Sep;4(9):875–876. doi: 10.1038/nn0901-875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Kandil F. I., Fahle M. Purely temporal figure-ground segregation. Eur J Neurosci. 2001 May;13(10):2004–2008. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01573.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Lee S. H., Blake R. Visual form created solely from temporal structure. Science. 1999 May 14;284(5417):1165–1168. doi: 10.1126/science.284.5417.1165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Morgan M. J., Adam A., Mollon J. D. Dichromats detect colour-camouflaged objects that are not detected by trichromats. Proc Biol Sci. 1992 Jun 22;248(1323):291–295. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1992.0074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Shadlen M. N., Movshon J. A. Synchrony unbound: a critical evaluation of the temporal binding hypothesis. Neuron. 1999 Sep;24(1):67-77, 111-25. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80822-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Singer W. Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron. 1999 Sep;24(1):49-65, 111-25. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80821-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Singer W. Time as coding space? Curr Opin Neurobiol. 1999 Apr;9(2):189–194. doi: 10.1016/s0959-4388(99)80026-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Usher M., Donnelly N. Visual synchrony affects binding and segmentation in perception. Nature. 1998 Jul 9;394(6689):179–182. doi: 10.1038/28166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES