Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Mar 7;269(1490):461–465. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1914

Manipulation of offspring sex ratio by second-mated female house wrens.

Daniel J Albrecht 1, L Scott Johnson 1
PMCID: PMC1690922  PMID: 11886637

Abstract

In 1973, Trivers and Willard proposed that offspring sex ratio should be associated with the quality of parental care likely to be provided to the offspring. We tested this hypothesis by comparing fledgling sex ratios in nests of first- and second-mated female house wrens (Troglodytes aedon). In our Wyoming population, second-mated females typically receive little or no male parental assistance and fledge fewer and lower-quality young compared with first-mated females. Assuming that being of lower quality has stronger negative effects on the future reproductive success of males than that of females in this polygynous population, we predicted that fledgling sex ratios in the nests of second-mated females would be female-biased compared with the fledgling sex ratios of first-mated females. Additionally, we asked whether any sex bias at fledging could have resulted from male-biased nestling mortality caused by sex-biased parental provisioning. As predicted, mean fledgling sex ratios in nests of second-mated females were more female-biased than fledgling sex ratios in nests of first-mated females. However, we found no evidence of either sex-biased nestling mortality or sex-biased parental provisioning. These findings suggest that females are responding to their status as second-mated females and to the associated low-quality parental care that their young are likely to receive by producing female-biased clutches rather than manipulating the offspring sex ratio through sex-biased nestling mortality.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (83.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Clutton-Brock T. H., Iason G. R. Sex ratio variation in mammals. Q Rev Biol. 1986 Sep;61(3):339–374. doi: 10.1086/415033. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Emlen S. T., Oring L. W. Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science. 1977 Jul 15;197(4300):215–223. doi: 10.1126/science.327542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Griffiths R., Daan S., Dijkstra C. Sex identification in birds using two CHD genes. Proc Biol Sci. 1996 Sep 22;263(1374):1251–1256. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1996.0184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Kilner R. Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by zebra finches. Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):155–164. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Krackow S. Potential mechanisms for sex ratio adjustment in mammals and birds. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1995 May;70(2):225–241. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.1995.tb01066.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. McClure P. A. Sex-Biased Litter Reduction in Food-Restricted Wood Rats (Neotoma floridana). Science. 1981 Mar 6;211(4486):1058–1060. doi: 10.1126/science.211.4486.1058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Trivers R. L., Willard D. E. Natural selection of parental ability to vary the sex ratio of offspring. Science. 1973 Jan 5;179(4068):90–92. doi: 10.1126/science.179.4068.90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES