Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Apr 7;269(1492):721–727. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1947

Kin-recognition abilities and nepotism as a function of sociality.

Jill M Mateo 1
PMCID: PMC1690948  PMID: 11934364

Abstract

Despite widespread interest in kin selection and nepotism, relatively little is known about the perceptual abilities of animals to recognize their relatives. Here I show that a highly nepotistic species, Belding's ground squirrels (Spermophilus beldingi), produces odours from at least two sources that correlate with relatedness ('kin labels'), and that ground squirrels can use these odours to make accurate discriminations among never before encountered ('unfamiliar') kin. Recognition odours appear to vary linearly with relatedness, rather than in an all-or-none fashion, allowing precise estimates of kinship even among distant relatives. Thus S. beldingi are able to recognize their distant kin and male kin, even though they do not treat them preferentially. I also show that a closely related species (S. lateralis) similarly produces kin labels and discriminates among kin, although it shows no evidence of kin-directed behaviour. Thus, contrary to a commonly held assumption, kin favouritism and recognition abilities can evolve independently, depending on variation in the costs and benefits of nepotism for a given species.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (166.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Beecher M. D. Kin recognition in birds. Behav Genet. 1988 Jul;18(4):465–482. doi: 10.1007/BF01065515. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hatchwell B. J., Ross D. J., Fowlie M. K., McGowan A. Kin discrimination in cooperatively breeding long-tailed tits. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 May 7;268(1470):885–890. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1598. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Johnston R. E. Attraction to odors in hamsters: an evaluation of methods. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1981 Dec;95(6):951–960. doi: 10.1037/h0077840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Mateo J. M., Johnston R. E. Kin recognition and the 'armpit effect': evidence of self-referent phenotype matching. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Apr 7;267(1444):695–700. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1058. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Mateo JM, Holmes WG. Development of alarm-call responses in Belding's ground squirrels: the role of dams. Anim Behav. 1997 Sep;54(3):509–524. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Mateo JM, Johnston RE. Retention of social recognition after hibernation in Belding's ground squirrels. Anim Behav. 2000 Mar;59(3):491–499. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Sherman P. W. Nepotism and the evolution of alarm calls. Science. 1977 Sep 23;197(4310):1246–1253. doi: 10.1126/science.197.4310.1246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Smith S. R. Miscellaneous: In praise of the Basuto pony. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 Dec 24;287(6409):1985–1987. doi: 10.1136/bmj.287.6409.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES