Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Apr 7;269(1492):685–694. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1878

Sanctions and mutualism stability: why do rhizobia fix nitrogen?

Stuart A West 1, E Toby Kiers 1, Ellen L Simms 1, R Ford Denison 1
PMCID: PMC1690951  PMID: 11934359

Abstract

Why do rhizobia expend resources on fixing N(2) for the benefit of their host plant, when they could use those resources for their own reproduction? We present a series of theoretical models which counter the hypotheses that N(2) fixation is favoured because it (i) increases the exudation of useful resources to related rhizobia in the nearby soil, or (ii) increases plant growth and therefore the resources available for rhizobia growth. Instead, we suggest that appreciable levels of N(2) fixation are only favoured when plants preferentially supply more resources to (or are less likely to senesce) nodules that are fixing more N(2) (termed plant sanctions). The implications for different agricultural practices and mutualism stability in general are discussed.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (164.7 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Axelrod R., Hamilton W. D. The evolution of cooperation. Science. 1981 Mar 27;211(4489):1390–1396. doi: 10.1126/science.7466396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bethlenfalvay G. J., Abu-Shakra S. S., Phillips D. A. Interdependence of Nitrogen Nutrition and Photosynthesis in Pisum sativum L: II. Host Plant Response to Nitrogen Fixation by Rhizobium Strains. Plant Physiol. 1978 Jul;62(1):131–133. doi: 10.1104/pp.62.1.131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bever J. D., Simms E. L. Evolution of nitrogen fixation in spatially structured populations of Rhizobium. Heredity (Edinb) 2000 Oct;85(Pt 4):366–372. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00772.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bull J. J., Rice W. R. Distinguishing mechanisms for the evolution of co-operation. J Theor Biol. 1991 Mar 7;149(1):63–74. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5193(05)80072-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Crespi B. J. The evolution of social behavior in microorganisms. Trends Ecol Evol. 2001 Apr 1;16(4):178–183. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02115-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Doebeli M., Knowlton N. The evolution of interspecific mutualisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 21;95(15):8676–8680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Frank S. A. Genetics of mutualism: the evolution of altruism between species. J Theor Biol. 1994 Oct 21;170(4):393–400. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Frank S. A. Kin selection and virulence in the evolution of protocells and parasites. Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Nov 22;258(1352):153–161. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hagen M. J., Hamrick J. L. A hierarchical analysis of population genetic structure in Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. trifolii. Mol Ecol. 1996 Apr;5(2):177–186. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00305.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Herre EA, Knowlton N, Mueller UG, Rehner SA. The evolution of mutualisms: exploring the paths between conflict and cooperation. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Feb;14(2):49–53. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01529-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kelly J. K. The effect of scale dependent processes on kin selection: mating and density regulation. Theor Popul Biol. 1994 Aug;46(1):32–57. doi: 10.1006/tpbi.1994.1018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mitteldorf J., Wilson D. S. Population viscosity and the evolution of altruism. J Theor Biol. 2000 Jun 21;204(4):481–496. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Moawad H. A., Ellis W. R., Schmidt E. L. Rhizosphere Response as a Factor in Competition Among Three Serogroups of Indigenous Rhizobium japonicum for Nodulation of Field-Grown Soybeans. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1984 Apr;47(4):607–612. doi: 10.1128/aem.47.4.607-612.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  15. Reyes V. G., Schmidt E. L. Population Densities of Rhizobium japonicum Strain 123 Estimated Directly in Soil and Rhizospheres. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1979 May;37(5):854–858. doi: 10.1128/aem.37.5.854-858.1979. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Sarath G., Pfeiffer N. E., Sodhi C. S., Wagner F. W. Bacteroids Are Stable during Dark-Induced Senescence of Soybean Root Nodules. Plant Physiol. 1986 Oct;82(2):346–350. doi: 10.1104/pp.82.2.346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Segovia L., Piñero D., Palacios R., Martínez-Romero E. Genetic structure of a soil population of nonsymbiotic Rhizobium leguminosarum. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991 Feb;57(2):426–433. doi: 10.1128/aem.57.2.426-433.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Taylor D. L., Bruns T. D. Independent, specialized invasions of ectomycorrhizal mutualism by two nonphotosynthetic orchids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Apr 29;94(9):4510–4515. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.9.4510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Taylor P. D., Frank S. A. How to make a kin selection model. J Theor Biol. 1996 May 7;180(1):27–37. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.1996.0075. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Timmers A. C., Soupène E., Auriac M. C., de Billy F., Vasse J., Boistard P., Truchet G. Saprophytic intracellular rhizobia in alfalfa nodules. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2000 Nov;13(11):1204–1213. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2000.13.11.1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. West S. A., Murray M. G., Machado C. A., Griffin A. S., Herre E. A. Testing Hamilton's rule with competition between relatives. Nature. 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):510–513. doi: 10.1038/35054057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Wong P. P., Evans H. J. Poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate Utilization by Soybean (Glycine max Merr.) Nodules and Assessment of Its Role in Maintenance of Nitrogenase Activity. Plant Physiol. 1971 Jun;47(6):750–755. doi: 10.1104/pp.47.6.750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES