Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Apr 7;269(1492):729–733. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1930

Sexual equality in zebra finch song preference: evidence for a dissociation between song recognition and production learning.

Katharina Riebel 1, Isabel M Smallegange 1, Nienke J Terpstra 1, Johan J Bolhuis 1
PMCID: PMC1690953  PMID: 11934365

Abstract

Song in oscine birds is a culturally inherited mating signal and sexually dimorphic. From differences in song production learning, sex differences in song recognition learning have been inferred but rarely put to a stringent test. In zebra finches, Taeniopygia guttata, females never sing and the species has one of the greatest neuroanatomical differences in song-related brain nuclei reported for songbirds. Preference tests with sibling groups for which exposure to song had been identical during the sensitive phase for song learning in males, revealed equally strong influence of the tutor's song (here the father) on males' and females' adult song preferences. Both sexes significantly preferred the father's over unfamiliar song when having free control over exposure to playbacks via an operant task. The sibling comparisons suggest that this preference developed independently of the song's absolute quality: variation between siblings was as great as between nests. The results show that early exposure has an equally strong influence on males' and females' song preferences despite the sexual asymmetry in song production learning. This suggests that the trajectory for song recognition learning is independent of the one for song production learning.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (90.8 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Bolhuis J. J., Hetebrij E., Den Boer-Visser A. M., De Groot J. H., Zijlstra G. G. Localized immediate early gene expression related to the strength of song learning in socially reared zebra finches. Eur J Neurosci. 2001 Jun;13(11):2165–2170. doi: 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01588.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bolhuis J. J., Zijlstra G. G., den Boer-Visser A. M., Van Der Zee E. A. Localized neuronal activation in the zebra finch brain is related to the strength of song learning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Feb 29;97(5):2282–2285. doi: 10.1073/pnas.030539097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braaten RF, Reynolds K. Auditory preference for conspecific song in isolation-reared zebra finches. Anim Behav. 1999 Jul;58(1):105–111. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1134. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Cynx J., Nottebohm F. Role of gender, season, and familiarity in discrimination of conspecific song by zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1992 Feb 15;89(4):1368–1371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.89.4.1368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Cynx J., Williams H., Nottebohm F. Timbre discrimination in zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) song syllables. J Comp Psychol. 1990 Dec;104(4):303–308. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.104.4.303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Gahr M., Sonnenschein E., Wickler W. Sex difference in the size of the neural song control regions in a dueting songbird with similar song repertoire size of males and females. J Neurosci. 1998 Feb 1;18(3):1124–1131. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-03-01124.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gil D., Graves J., Hazon N., Wells A. Male attractiveness and differential testosterone investment in zebra finch eggs. Science. 1999 Oct 1;286(5437):126–128. doi: 10.1126/science.286.5437.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Houx AB, Ten cate C Song learning from playback in zebra finches: is there an effect of operant contingency? Anim Behav. 1999 Apr;57(4):837–845. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnsrude I. S., Weary D. M., Ratcliffe L. M., Weisman R. G. Effect of motivational context on conspecific song discrimination by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater). J Comp Psychol. 1994 Jun;108(2):172–178. doi: 10.1037/0735-7036.108.2.172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Kilner R. Primary and secondary sex ratio manipulation by zebra finches. Anim Behav. 1998 Jul;56(1):155–164. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0775. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. MacDougall-Shackleton S. A., Ball G. F. Comparative studies of sex differences in the song-control system of songbirds. Trends Neurosci. 1999 Oct;22(10):432–436. doi: 10.1016/s0166-2236(99)01434-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. MacDougall-Shackleton S. A., Hulse S. H., Ball G. F. Neural bases of song preferences in female zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Neuroreport. 1998 Sep 14;9(13):3047–3052. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199809140-00024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Nottebohm F., Alvarez-Buylla A., Cynx J., Kirn J., Ling C. Y., Nottebohm M., Suter R., Tolles A., Williams H. Song learning in birds: the relation between perception and production. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1990 Aug 29;329(1253):115–124. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1990.0156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Payne RB, Payne LL, Woods JL, Sorenson MD. Imprinting and the origin of parasite-host species associations in brood-parasitic indigobirds, Vidua chalybeata. Anim Behav. 2000 Jan;59(1):69–81. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Pearson FD, Mann NI, Slater PJ. Does leg-ring colour affect song tutor choice in zebra finches? Anim Behav. 1999 Jan;57(1):173–180. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0924. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pytte C. L., Suthers R. A. A bird's own song contributes to conspecific song perception. Neuroreport. 1999 Jun 3;10(8):1773–1778. doi: 10.1097/00001756-199906030-00027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Riebel K. Early exposure leads to repeatable preferences for male song in female zebra finches. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 22;267(1461):2553–2558. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1320. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Riebel K, Slater PJB. Testing female chaffinch song preferences by operant conditioning. Anim Behav. 1998 Dec;56(6):1443–1453. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Smith VA, King AP, West MJ. A role of her own: female cowbirds, Molothrus ater, influence the development and outcome of song learning. Anim Behav. 2000 Nov;60(5):599–609. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Tchernichovski O., Nottebohm F. Social inhibition of song imitation among sibling male zebra finches. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Jul 21;95(15):8951–8956. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wagner WE. Measuring female mating preferences. Anim Behav. 1998 Apr;55(4):1029–1042. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.0635. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES