Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Apr 22;269(1493):867–872. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1959

Bateman's principle and immunity.

Jens Rolff 1
PMCID: PMC1690964  PMID: 11958720

Abstract

The immunocompetence handicap hypothesis (ICHH) of Folstad and Karter has inspired a large number of studies that have tried to understand the causal basis of parasite-mediated sexual selection. Even though this hypothesis is based on the double function of testosterone, a hormone restricted to vertebrates, studies of invertebrates have tended to provide central support for specific predictions of the ICHH. I propose an alternative hypothesis that explains many of the findings without relying on testosterone or other biochemical feedback loops. This alternative is based on Bateman's principle, that males gain fitness by increasing their mating success whilst females increase fitness through longevity because their reproductive effort is much higher. Consequently, I predict that females should invest more in immunity than males. The extent of this dimorphism is determined by the mating system and the genetic correlation between males and females in immune traits. In support of my arguments, I mainly use studies on insects that share innate immunity with vertebrates and have the advantage that they are easier to study.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (80.0 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Azambuja P., Garcia E. S., Mello C. B., Feder D. Immune responses in Rhodnius prolixus: influence of nutrition and ecdysone. J Insect Physiol. 1997 Jun;43(6):513–519. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(97)00010-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bilbo S. D., Nelson R. J. Sex steroid hormones enhance immune function in male and female Siberian hamsters. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2001 Jan;280(1):R207–R213. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.2001.280.1.R207. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Braune P., Rolff J. Parasitism and survival in a damselfly: does host sex matter? Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 7;268(1472):1133–1137. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Buchanan K. L., Evans M. R., Goldsmith A. R., Bryant D. M., Rowe L. V. Testosterone influences basal metabolic rate in male house sparrows: a new cost of dominance signalling? Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jul 7;268(1474):1337–1344. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Chippindale A. K., Gibson J. R., Rice W. R. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jan 30;98(4):1671–1675. doi: 10.1073/pnas.041378098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Fellowes M. D., Godfray H. C. The evolutionary ecology of resistance to parasitoids by Drosophila. Heredity (Edinb) 2000 Jan;84(Pt 1):1–8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00685.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gray D. A. Sex differences in susceptibility of house crickets, acheta domesticus, to experimental infection with Serratia liquefaciens. J Invertebr Pathol. 1998 May;71(3):288–289. doi: 10.1006/jipa.1997.4742. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Grossman C. Possible underlying mechanisms of sexual dimorphism in the immune response, fact and hypothesis. J Steroid Biochem. 1989;34(1-6):241–251. doi: 10.1016/0022-4731(89)90088-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hamilton W. D., Zuk M. Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites? Science. 1982 Oct 22;218(4570):384–387. doi: 10.1126/science.7123238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hultmark D. Immune reactions in Drosophila and other insects: a model for innate immunity. Trends Genet. 1993 May;9(5):178–183. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90165-e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kraaijeveld A. R., Godfray H. C. Trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Nature. 1997 Sep 18;389(6648):278–280. doi: 10.1038/38483. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kraaijeveld A. R., Limentani E. C., Godfray H. C. Basis of the trade-off between parasitoid resistance and larval competitive ability in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Feb 7;268(1464):259–261. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kurtz J., Sauer K. P. Gender differences in phenoloxidase activity of Panorpa vulgaris hemocytes. J Invertebr Pathol. 2001 Jul;78(1):53–55. doi: 10.1006/jipa.2001.5040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kurtz J., Wiesner A., Götz P., Sauer K. P. Gender differences and individual variation in the immune system of the scorpionfly Panorpa vulgaris (Insecta: Mecoptera). Dev Comp Immunol. 2000 Jan;24(1):1–12. doi: 10.1016/s0145-305x(99)00057-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Kurtz J, Sauer KP. The immunocompetence handicap hypothesis: testing the genetic predictions. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Dec 22;266(1437):2515–2522. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Moret Y., Schmid-Hempel P. Survival for immunity: the price of immune system activation for bumblebee workers. Science. 2000 Nov 10;290(5494):1166–1168. doi: 10.1126/science.290.5494.1166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Nigam Y., Maudlin I., Welburn S., Ratcliffe N. A. Detection of phenoloxidase activity in the hemolymph of tsetse flies, refractory and susceptible to infection with Trypanosoma brucei rhodesiense. J Invertebr Pathol. 1997 May;69(3):279–281. doi: 10.1006/jipa.1996.4652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  19. Peters A. Testosterone treatment is immunosuppressive in superb fairy-wrens, yet free-living males with high testosterone are more immunocompetent. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 May 7;267(1446):883–889. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Prévost G., Eslin P. Hemocyte load and immune resistance to Asobara tabida are correlated in species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. J Insect Physiol. 1998 Sep;44(9):807–816. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1910(98)00013-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rice W. R. Male fitness increases when females are eliminated from gene pool: implications for the Y chromosome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 May 26;95(11):6217–6221. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.11.6217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Ryder J. J., Siva-Jothy M. T. Male calling song provides a reliable signal of immune function in a cricket. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Jun 22;267(1449):1171–1175. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Siva-Jothy M. T. A mechanistic link between parasite resistance and expression of a sexually selected trait in a damselfly. Proc Biol Sci. 2000 Dec 22;267(1461):2523–2527. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Verhulst S., Dieleman S. J., Parmentier H. K. A tradeoff between immunocompetence and sexual ornamentation in domestic fowl. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Apr 13;96(8):4478–4481. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Vilmos P., Kurucz E. Insect immunity: evolutionary roots of the mammalian innate immune system. Immunol Lett. 1998 Jun;62(2):59–66. doi: 10.1016/s0165-2478(98)00023-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Zuk M., McKean K. A. Sex differences in parasite infections: patterns and processes. Int J Parasitol. 1996 Oct;26(10):1009–1023. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. van Sambeek J., Wiesner A. Successful parasitation of locusts by entomopathogenic nematodes is correlated with inhibition of insect phagocytes. J Invertebr Pathol. 1999 Mar;73(2):154–161. doi: 10.1006/jipa.1998.4823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES