Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 Apr 22;269(1493):831–837. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1941

Eye size in birds and the timing of song at dawn.

Robert J Thomas 1, Tamás Székely 1, Innes C Cuthill 1, David G C Harper 1, Stuart E Newson 1, Tim D Frayling 1, Paul D Wallis 1
PMCID: PMC1690967  PMID: 11958715

Abstract

Why do different species of birds start their dawn choruses at different times? We test the hypothesis that the times at which different species start singing at dawn are related to their visual capability at low light intensities. Birds with large eyes can achieve greater pupil diameters and hence, all other things being equal, greater visual sensitivity and resolution than birds with small eyes. We estimated the maximum pupil diameter of passerine birds by measuring the diameter of the exposed eye surface, and measured the times of the first songs at dawn of songbirds present in different bird communities, and the light intensities at these times. Using phylogenetic comparative analyses, we found that songbirds with large eyes started to sing at lower light intensities (and therefore earlier) than species with smaller eyes. These relationships were stronger when differences in body size were controlled for statistically, and were consistent between two phylogenies and when species were treated as independent data points. Our results therefore provide robust support for the hypothesis that visual capability at low light levels influences the times at which birds start to sing at dawn.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (131.5 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barlow H. B. The Ferrier Lecture, 1980. Critical limiting factors in the design of the eye and visual cortex. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1981 May 7;212(1186):1–34. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1981.0022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Harvey P. H., Rambaut A. Comparative analyses for adaptive radiations. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2000 Nov 29;355(1403):1599–1605. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2000.0721. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Laughlin S. B., de Ruyter van Steveninck R. R., Anderson J. C. The metabolic cost of neural information. Nat Neurosci. 1998 May;1(1):36–41. doi: 10.1038/236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Martins El. Adaptation and the comparative method. Trends Ecol Evol. 2000 Jul;15(7):296–299. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(00)01880-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
  6. Price T. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1997 Apr 29;352(1352):519–529. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.0036. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Rojas L. M., McNeil R., Cabana T., Lachapelle P. Diurnal and nocturnal visual capabilities in shorebirds as a function of their feeding strategies. Brain Behav Evol. 1999;53(1):29–43. doi: 10.1159/000006580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Snyder A. W., Laughlin S. B., Stavenga D. G. Information capacity of eyes. Vision Res. 1977;17(10):1163–1175. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(77)90151-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Thomas RJ. Strategic diel regulation of body mass in European robins. Anim Behav. 2000 Apr;59(4):787–791. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data file
11958715s01.pdf (369.3KB, pdf)

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES