Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 May 7;269(1494):937–942. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1958

Modelling the survival of bacteria in drylands: the advantage of being dormant.

M Bär 1, J von Hardenberg 1, E Meron 1, A Provenzale 1
PMCID: PMC1690970  PMID: 12028777

Abstract

We introduce a simple mathematical model for the description of 'dormancy', a survival strategy used by some bacterial populations that are intermittently exposed to external stress. We focus on the case of the cyanobacterial crust in drylands, exposed to severe water shortage, and compare the fate of ideal populations that are, respectively, capable or incapable of becoming dormant. The results of the simple model introduced here indicate that under a constant, even though low, supply of water the dormant strategy does not provide any benefit and it can, instead, decrease the chances of survival of the population. The situation is reversed for highly intermittent external stress, due to the presence of prolonged periods of dry conditions intermingled with short periods of intense precipitation. In this case, dormancy allows for the survival of the population during the dry periods. In contrast, bacteria that are incapable of turning into a dormant state cannot overcome the difficult times. The model also rationalizes why dormant bacteria, such as those composing the cyanobacterial crust in the desert, are extremely sensitive to other disturbances, such as trampling cattle.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (255.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Barer M. R., Harwood C. R. Bacterial viability and culturability. Adv Microb Physiol. 1999;41:93–137. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2911(08)60166-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Kell D. B., Kaprelyants A. S., Weichart D. H., Harwood C. R., Barer M. R. Viability and activity in readily culturable bacteria: a review and discussion of the practical issues. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1998 Feb;73(2):169–187. doi: 10.1023/a:1000664013047. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Oliver J. D. The viable but non-culturable state in the human pathogen Vibrio vulnificus. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1995 Nov 15;133(3):203–208. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1995.tb07885.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Potts M. Desiccation tolerance of prokaryotes. Microbiol Rev. 1994 Dec;58(4):755–805. doi: 10.1128/mr.58.4.755-805.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Roszak D. B., Colwell R. R. Survival strategies of bacteria in the natural environment. Microbiol Rev. 1987 Sep;51(3):365–379. doi: 10.1128/mr.51.3.365-379.1987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES