Abstract
Aggressive contests probably occur in networking environments where information about fighting ability is conveyed both to an opponent and to individuals peripheral to the fight itself, the bystanders. Our primary aim was to investigate the relative influences of eavesdropping and prior social experience on the dynamics of aggressive contests in Xiphophorus helleri. A bystander's ability to witness an encounter was manipulated using clear, one-way mirror, and opaque partitions. After watching (or not watching) the initial contest, the bystander encountered either the winner or loser of the bout. Treatment comparisons of bystander-winner or bystander-loser contest dynamics indicated the presence or absence of winner, loser, or eavesdropping effects. Winner and loser effects had negligible influences on bystander contest dynamics. Eavesdropping significantly reduced the bystander's propensity to initiate aggression, escalate, and win against seen winners regardless of whether the watched bout had escalated or not. Though eavesdropping had relatively little effect on bystander-loser contest dynamics, bystanders were less prone to initiate aggression and win against losers that had escalated in the witnessed bout. Thus, bystanders appear to preferentially retain and utilize information gained about potentially dangerous opponents (winners or persistent losers). Our data lend clear support for the importance of eavesdropping in visually based aggressive signalling systems.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (216.7 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Beaugrand JP, Goulet C. Distinguishing kinds of prior dominance and subordination experiences in males of green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri). Behav Processes. 2000 Aug 17;50(2-3):131–142. doi: 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00096-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hsu Y, Wolf LL. The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences. Anim Behav. 1999 Apr;57(4):903–910. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.1049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnsson JI, Åkerman A. Watch and learn: preview of the fighting ability of opponents alters contest behaviour in rainbow trout. Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):771–776. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Johnstone R. A. Eavesdropping and animal conflict. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 Jul 17;98(16):9177–9180. doi: 10.1073/pnas.161058798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Naguib M, Todt D. Effects of dyadic vocal interactions on other conspecific receivers in nightingales. Anim Behav. 1997 Dec;54(6):1535–1543. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1997.9997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1998.0397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Payne RJH. Gradually escalating fights and displays: the cumulative assessment model. Anim Behav. 1998 Sep;56(3):651–662. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1998.0835. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Peake T. M., Terry A. M., McGregor P. K., Dabelsteen T. Male great tits eavesdrop on simulated male-to-male vocal interactions. Proc Biol Sci. 2001 Jun 7;268(1472):1183–1187. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2001.1648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schuett GW. Body size and agonistic experience affect dominance and mating success in male copperheads. Anim Behav. 1997 Jul;54(1):213–224. doi: 10.1006/anbe.1996.0417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thines G., Heuts B. The effect of submissive experiences on dominance and aggressive behaviour of Xiphophorus (Pisces, Poeciliidae). Z Tierpsychol. 1968 Mar;25(2):139–154. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0310.1968.tb00009.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]