Skip to main content
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences logoLink to Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
. 2002 May 7;269(1494):909–913. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.1962

Division of labour influences the rate of ageing in weaver ant workers.

Michel Chapuisat 1, Laurent Keller 1
PMCID: PMC1690981  PMID: 12028773

Abstract

The evolutionary theory of ageing predicts that the timing of senescence has been primarily shaped by the extrinsic mortality rate, which causes selection intensity to decline over time. One difficulty in testing the evolutionary theory of ageing is that extrinsic mortality risk is often confounded with body size and fecundity, which may also directly affect lifespan. Social insects with a pronounced division of labour between worker castes provide a unique opportunity to study the direct effect of extrinsic mortality on the evolution of ageing rates independently of body size, reproductive effort and genetic configuration. In the weaver ant, Oecophylla smaragdina, the major (large) workers perform the risky tasks outside the nest, while the minor (small) workers stay within the highly protected arboreal nest. Hence, this pronounced division of labour is associated with high differences in extrinsic mortality risks. The evolutionary theory of ageing predicts that the minor workers should have a longer intrinsic lifespan than the major workers. In line with this prediction, we found that in a protected environment the minor workers lived significantly longer than the major workers did. Hence, the ageing rate appears to have been moulded by variation in the extrinsic mortality rate independently of size, reproductive effort and genetic configuration.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (90.2 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Austad S. N., Fischer K. E. Mammalian aging, metabolism, and ecology: evidence from the bats and marsupials. J Gerontol. 1991 Mar;46(2):B47–B53. doi: 10.1093/geronj/46.2.b47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hamilton W. D. The moulding of senescence by natural selection. J Theor Biol. 1966 Sep;12(1):12–45. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90184-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Hölldobler B., Lumsden C. J. Territorial strategies in ants. Science. 1980 Nov 14;210(4471):732–739. doi: 10.1126/science.210.4471.732. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hölldobler B., Wilson E. O. Weaver ants: social establishment and maintenance of territory. Science. 1977 Mar 4;195(4281):900–902. doi: 10.1126/science.841318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Kirkwood T. B., Austad S. N. Why do we age? Nature. 2000 Nov 9;408(6809):233–238. doi: 10.1038/35041682. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Kirkwood T. B. Evolution of ageing. Nature. 1977 Nov 24;270(5635):301–304. doi: 10.1038/270301a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Lighton J. R., Bartholomew G. A. Standard energy metabolism of a desert harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex rugosus: Effects of temperature, body mass, group size, and humidity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1988 Jul;85(13):4765–4769. doi: 10.1073/pnas.85.13.4765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Partridge L., Barton N. H. Optimality, mutation and the evolution of ageing. Nature. 1993 Mar 25;362(6418):305–311. doi: 10.1038/362305a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Partridge L., Prowse N., Pignatelli P. Another set of responses and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci. 1999 Feb 7;266(1416):255–261. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Promislow D. E. Longevity and the barren aristocrat. Nature. 1998 Dec 24;396(6713):719–720. doi: 10.1038/25440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Stearns S. C., Ackermann M., Doebeli M., Kaiser M. Experimental evolution of aging, growth, and reproduction in fruitflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Mar 28;97(7):3309–3313. doi: 10.1073/pnas.060289597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. WILSON E. O. The origin and evolution of polymorphism in ants. Q Rev Biol. 1953 Jun;28(2):136–156. doi: 10.1086/399512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Westendorp R. G., Kirkwood T. B. Human longevity at the cost of reproductive success. Nature. 1998 Dec 24;396(6713):743–746. doi: 10.1038/25519. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Zwaan B. J. The evolutionary genetics of ageing and longevity. Heredity (Edinb) 1999 Jun;82(Pt 6):589–597. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2540.1999.00544.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences are provided here courtesy of The Royal Society

RESOURCES